ArticleGenetic epidemiology2020
Identification of gene-environment interactions with marginal penalization.
Article in Genetic epidemiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Ordinal Sparse Neural Networks for Modeling Gene- and Imaging-Environment Interactions.Statistics in medicine · 2025Article
- High-Dimensional Gene-Environment Interaction Analysis.Annual review of statistics and its application · 2025Article
- Aligned deep neural network for integrative analysis with high-dimensional input.Journal of biomedical informatics · 2023Article
- Gene-environment interaction analysis via deep learning.Genetic epidemiology · 2023Article
- Sparse group variable selection for gene-environment interactions in the longitudinal study.Genetic epidemiology · 2022Article
- Gene-Environment Interaction: A Variable Selection Perspective.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2021Review
- Identifying Gene-Environment Interactions With Robust Marginal Bayesian Variable Selection.Frontiers in genetics · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Gene-environment (G-E) interaction analysis has been extensively conducted for complex diseases. In marginal analysis, the common practice is to conduct likelihood-based (and other "standard") estimation with each marginal model, and then select significant G-E interactions and main effects based on p values and multiple comparisons adjustment. One limitation of this approach is that the identification results often do not respect the "main effects, interactions" hierarchy, which has been stressed in recent G-E interaction analyses. There is some recent effort tackling this problem, however, with very complex formulations. Another limitation of the common practice is that it may not perform well when regularization is needed, for example, because of "non-normal" distributions. In this article, we propose a marginal penalization approach which adopts a novel penalty to directly tackle the aforementioned problems. The proposed approach has a framework more coherent with that of the recently developed joint analysis methods and an intuitive formulation, and can be effectively realized. In simulation, it outperforms the popular significance-based analysis and simple penalization-based alternatives. Promising findings are made in the analysis of a single-nucleotide polymorphism and a gene expression data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.