Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31724426›Full record

ArticleJournal of consulting and clinical psychology2019

Integrating the Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP) into clinical practice.

Camilo J Ruggero, Roman Kotov, Christopher J Hopwood, Michael First, Lee Anna Clark, Andrew E Skodol, Stephanie N Mullins-Sweatt, Christopher J Patrick, Bo Bach, David C Cicero and 23 more

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of consulting and clinical psychology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 108 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
108citing papers in PubMed, 9 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

108 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Trial
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Advancing clinical psychology with improved doctoral training in science.Training and education in professional psychology · 2026
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

48 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

33 authors.

Camilo J RuggeroDepartment of Psychology, University of North Texas.
Roman KotovDepartment of Psychiatry, Stony Brook University.
Christopher J HopwoodDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Davis.ORCID 0000-0001-6645-8645
Michael FirstDepartment of Psychiatry, New York State Psychiatric Institute, Columbia University.
Lee Anna ClarkDepartment of Psychology, University of Notre Dame.
Andrew E SkodolDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Arizona.
Stephanie N Mullins-SweattDepartment of Psychology, Oklahoma State University.
Christopher J PatrickDepartment of Psychology, Florida State University.
Bo BachPsychiatric Research Unit, Slagelse Psychiatric Hospital.
David C CiceroDepartment of Psychology, University of North Texas.
Anna DochertyDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Utah.
Leonard J SimmsDepartment of Psychology, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York.
R Michael BagbyDepartments of Psychology and Psychiatry, University of Toronto.
Robert F KruegerDepartment of Psychology, University of Minnesota.
Jennifer L CallahanDepartment of Psychology, University of North Texas.
Michael ChmielewskiDepartment of Psychology, Southern Methodist University.
Christopher C ConwayDepartment of Psychological Sciences, College of William and Mary.
Barbara De ClercqDepartment of Developmental, Personality, and Social Psychology, Ghent University.
Allison Dornbach-BenderDepartment of Psychology, University of North Texas.
Nicholas R EatonDepartment of Psychology, Stony Brook University.
Miriam K ForbesCentre for Emotional Health, Department of Psychology, Macquarie University.
Kelsie T ForbushDepartment of Psychology, University of Kansas.
John D HaltiganDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Toronto.
Joshua D MillerDepartment of Psychology, University of Georgia.
Leslie C MoreyDepartment of Psychology, Texas A&M University.
Praveetha PatalayCentre for Longitudinal Studies and MRC Unit for Lifelong Health and Ageing, University College London.
Darrel A RegierDepartment of Psychiatry, Center for the Study of Traumatic Stress, Uniformed Services University.
Ulrich ReininghausDepartment of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, Maastricht University.ORCID 0000-0002-9227-5436
Alexander J ShackmanDepartment of Psychology, University of Maryland.
Monika A WaszczukDepartment of Psychiatry, Stony Brook University.
David WatsonDepartment of Psychology, University of Notre Dame.
Aidan G C WrightDepartment of Psychology, University of Pittsburgh.
Johannes ZimmermannDepartment of Psychology, University of Kassel.

Funding

Prospective Determination of Neurobehavioral Risk for the Development of Emotion DisordersR01MH107444 · NIMH · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI SHACKMAN, ALEXANDER JOSEPH · 2016 to 2020
$3.4M
Modeling Dimensionality and Genetic Heterogeneity in SchizophreniaK01MH109765 · NIMH · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI DOCHERTY, ANNA R. · 2016 to 2019
$675k
The Role of Anxiety-Related Brain Circuits in Tobacco Dependence and WithdrawalR21DA040717 · NIDA · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI SHACKMAN, ALEXANDER JOSEPH · 2016 to 2017
$418k
NIDA NIH HHS R21 DA040717NIH HHSNIMH NIH HHS K01 MH109765NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH107444University of Maryland
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveDiagnosis is a cornerstone of clinical practice for mental health care providers, yet traditional diagnostic systems have well-known shortcomings, including inadequate reliability, high comorbidity, and marked within-diagnosis heterogeneity. The Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP) is a data-driven, hierarchically based alternative to traditional classifications that conceptualizes psychopathology as a set of dimensions organized into increasingly broad, transdiagnostic spectra. Prior work has shown that using a dimensional approach improves reliability and validity, but translating a model like HiTOP into a workable system that is useful for health care providers remains a major challenge.

methodThe present work outlines the HiTOP model and describes the core principles to guide its integration into clinical practice.

resultsPotential advantages and limitations of the HiTOP model for clinical utility are reviewed, including with respect to case conceptualization and treatment planning. A HiTOP approach to practice is illustrated and contrasted with an approach based on traditional nosology. Common barriers to using HiTOP in real-world health care settings and solutions to these barriers are discussed.

conclusionsHiTOP represents a viable alternative to classifying mental illness that can be integrated into practice today, although research is needed to further establish its utility. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

Indexed as

Models, TheoreticalAdolescentAdultHumansMental DisordersPsychopathology

Identifiers

PMID31724426
PMCPMC6859953

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.