Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31724329›Full record

Observational studyCancer medicine2020

Associations of reproductive factors with breast cancer prognosis and the modifying effects of menopausal status.

Jia-Yi Zhang, Mei-Xia Wang, Xiang Wang, Yue-Lin Li, Zhuo-Zhi Liang, Ying Lin, Qiang Liu, Xiao-Ming Xie, Lu-Ying Tang, Ze-Fang Ren

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Cancer medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Cohort profile: Guangzhou breast cancer study (GBCS).European journal of epidemiology · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jia-Yi ZhangSchool of Public Health, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Mei-Xia WangXiamen Branch, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Xiamen, China.
Xiang WangSchool of Public Health, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Yue-Lin LiSchool of Public Health, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Zhuo-Zhi LiangSchool of Public Health, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Ying LinThe First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Qiang LiuThe Second Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Xiao-Ming XieThe Sun Yat-sen Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
Lu-Ying TangThe Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Ze-Fang RenSchool of Public Health, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0002-7785-4704
Sun Yat-sen University · CNFudan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reproductive factors associated with breast cancer risk may also affect the prognosis. This study aimed to evaluate the associations of multiple reproductive factors with breast cancer prognosis and the modifying effects of menopausal status. We obtained data from 3805 breast cancer patients recruited between October 2008 and June 2016 in Guangzhou. The subjects were followed up until 30 June 2018. The hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were calculated using multivariate Cox models to estimate the associations. It was found that there were U-shaped patterns for the associations of age at first birth and durations from first/last birth to diagnosis with breast cancer prognosis. The adverse effects of old age at first birth [>30 years vs 23-30 years, HR (95% CI): 1.59 (1.01-2.50)] and long intervals from first [≥20 years vs 10-19 years, HR (95% CI): 1.55 (1.07-2.27)] or last [≥20 years vs 10-19 years, HR (95% CI): 1.63 (1.08-2.46)] birth to diagnosis on progression-free survival (PFS) were significantly more pronounced among premenopausal women. Additionally, long interval (>5 years) between first and second birth was associated with a better PFS [HR (95% CI): 0.64 (0.42-0.97)]. These results suggested that age at first birth, durations from first/last birth to diagnosis, and intervals between first and second birth should be taken into account when following the patients and assessing the prognosis of breast cancer, particularly for premenopausal patients. These findings would also have implications for further insight into the mechanisms of breast cancer development.

Indexed as

Reproductive HistoryAdultAge FactorsBreast NeoplasmsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMenopauseMiddle AgedPrognosisProgression-Free SurvivalRisk FactorsTime Factorsbreast cancermenopausal statusprognosisreproductive factors

Identifiers

PMID31724329
PMCPMC6943140
OpenAlexW2984392071

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.