Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31724284›Full record

ArticleBipolar disorders2020

Aberrant structural covariance networks in youth at high familial risk for mood disorder.

Kareen Heinze, Xueyi Shen, Emma Hawkins, Mathew A Harris, Laura de Nooij, Andrew M McIntosh, Stephen J Wood, Heather C Whalley

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bipolar disorders, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Intracortical Myelin in Youths at Risk for Depression.Biological psychiatry global open science · 2024
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Phenotype Network and Brain Structural Covariance Network of Major Depression.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Kareen HeinzeSchool of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5176-1403
Xueyi ShenDivision of Psychiatry, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Emma HawkinsDivision of Psychiatry, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Mathew A HarrisDivision of Psychiatry, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Laura de NooijDivision of Psychiatry, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Andrew M McIntoshDivision of Psychiatry, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Stephen J WoodSchool of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Heather C WhalleyDivision of Psychiatry, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
University of Edinburgh · GBBirmingham and Solihull Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust · GBThe University of Melbourne · AU

Funding

European Community's Seventh Framework Programme 602450Medical Research Council MC_PC_17209Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust Strategic Award 104036/Z/14/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesCurrent research suggests significant disruptions in functional brain networks in individuals with mood disorder, and in those at familial risk. Studies of structural brain networks provide important insights into synchronized maturational change but have received less attention. We aimed to investigate developmental relationships of large-scale brain networks in mood disorder using structural covariance (SC) analyses.

methodsWe conducted SC analysis of baseline structural imaging data from 121 at the time of scanning unaffected high risk (HR) individuals (29 later developed mood disorder after a median time of 4.95 years), and 89 healthy controls (C-well) with no familial risk from the Scottish Bipolar Family Study (age 15-27, 64% female). Voxel-wise analyses of covariance were conducted to compare the associations between each seed region in visual, auditory, motor, speech, semantic, executive-control, salience and default-mode networks and the whole brain signal. SC maps were compared for (a) HR(all) versus C-well individuals, and (b) between those who remained well (HR-well), versus those who subsequently developed mood disorder (HR-MD), and C-well.

resultsThere were no significant differences between HR(all) and C-well individuals. On splitting the HR group based on subsequent clinical outcome, the HR-MD group however displayed greater baseline SC in the salience and executive-control network, and HR-well individuals showed less SC in the salience network, compared to C-well, respectively (P < .001).

conclusionsThese findings indicate differences in network-level inter-regional relationships, especially within the salience network, which precede onset of mood disorder in those at familial risk.

Indexed as

AdolescentBipolar DisorderBrainBrain MappingExecutive FunctionFemaleGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMood DisordersNeural Pathwaysbipolar disorderexecutive control networkmajor depressive disordersalience networkstructural connectivitystructural imaging

Identifiers

PMID31724284
PMCPMC7155114
OpenAlexW2986412660

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.