ReviewClinical rheumatology2020
Reclaiming magical incantation in graduate medical education.
Review in Clinical rheumatology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Curriculum Innovation: Integrating Case-Based Learning With Seminar and Journal Club to Enhance Critical Thinking Skills in Residency Program.Neurology. Education · 2025Article
- Explain Breathlessness: Could 'Usual' Explanations Contribute to Maladaptive Beliefs of People Living with Breathlessness?Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Humanistic Spirit Training of Medical Students Based on Multisource Medical Data Fusion.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Critical thinking relies upon conceptualization (what is the possible pathophysiology?), analysis (how do I relate an aberration in physiology to the lived experience of illness?), and synthesizing (how do I best intervene?). These cognitive skills are subsumed in the category of reflective competencies and are necessary for developing a differential diagnosis or a plan of care. A vulnerability of teaching medicine through the filter of heuristics is that it may simply recapitulate the teacher's style of cognitive shortcuts. Poorly calibrated heuristics may culminate in systematic errors of judgment. If the aim is to teach critical reasoning in the arena of clinical education, then a new paradigm is called for. Teaching critical reasoning as it applies to medical decision-making begins with recognizing decision scripts.Key Points• Medical heuristics are high-stakes endeavors.• The process of examining the choice of heuristics employed in any given clinical scenario is a meta-reasoning strategy.• Debiasing reduces cognitive errors due to motivated reasoning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31724095What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.