ArticleInternational journal of colorectal disease2019
Local excision in rectal cancer patients with major or complete clinical response after neoadjuvant therapy: a case-matched study.
Article in International journal of colorectal disease, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Local excision versus total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer patients with clinical complete or near-complete response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.International journal of colorectal disease · 2024Article
- Trends in colorectal cancer surgical resection rates during the screening era: a retrospective study in Italy.BMJ open gastroenterology · 2024Article
- Survival prognostic in different age groups of patients undergoing local versus radical excision for rectal cancer: a study based on the SEER database.Updates in surgery · 2024Article
- Role of Local Excision for Suspected Regrowth in a Watch and Wait Strategy for Rectal Cancer.Cancers · 2022Article
- Does restaging MRI radiomics analysis improve pathological complete response prediction in rectal cancer patients? A prognostic model development.La Radiologia medica · 2022Article
- Clinical Effect of Radiotherapy Combined with Capecitabine after Neoadjuvant Therapy for Rectal Cancer.Journal of oncology · 2021Article
- Computertomography-Based Prediction of Complete Response Following Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo assess the long-term oncological outcomes in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer who underwent neoadjuvant therapy followed by local or total mesorectal excision.
methodsPatients with locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma who received neoadjuvant therapy from 2005 to 2017 were evaluated. Those with major or complete clinical response underwent a full-thickness local excision. Kaplan-Meier estimates were used to evaluate overall, disease-free, and local recurrence-free survival of patients who underwent local excision (LE group) and were compared with a matched cohort of patients who underwent total mesorectal excision (TME group).
resultsAmong 252 patients who received neoadjuvant therapy for rectal cancer, 51 (20.2%) underwent a local excision. At a median follow-up of 61 months, patients who underwent local excision were stoma-free in 88.2% of cases and with rectum preserved in 78.5% of cases, respectively. The estimated 5-year local, disease-free, and overall survival was 91.8% vs 97.6% (95% CI: 79.5-96.8 vs 84.6-99.6), 86.7% vs 86.4% (95% CI: 72.5-93.9 vs 70.1-94.1), and 85% vs 90% (95% CI: 69.0-93.0% vs 75.3-96.2), in the study and matched control group, respectively. None of the differences was statistically significant.
conclusionsOne-fifth of patients with locally advanced rectal cancer are manageable with a rectum-sparing approach after neoadjuvant therapy. With this strategy, about 80% patients will have their rectum preserved and 90% will be without stoma at long term.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.