ArticleMolecular genetics and genomics : MGG2020
A comparative transcriptomic analysis in late embryogenesis of the red claw crayfish Cherax quadricarinatus.
Article in Molecular genetics and genomics : MGG, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The red claw crayfish (Cherax quadricarinatus) is an emerging and important commercial species in several countries, and is also a potential biological model in crustacean biology. However, its molecular embryonic development mechanism remains largely unknown because of a lack of genomic resources and systematic research. A comprehensive and integrated transcriptomic analysis is necessary to reveal the cell biological function, gene expression profiles, and embryo patterning that occur during embryogenesis. In the present study, transcriptomic profiles of C. quadricarinatus embryos during three developmental stages were investigated by high-throughput Illumina sequencing technology, and the genes related to development were further analyzed. In total, 49,436 unigenes were assembled and clustered, in which 13,727 were annotated in the Nonredundant database, 5087 were classified based on Gene Ontology annotations, and 2735 were associated with 189 Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes pathways. Furthermore, gene expression differences among the embryos stages were analyzed, and 6658 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified. In total, 3300, 5211, and 1262 DEGs were identified between the eye pigments forming stage (EP) and prepare-hatching stage (PH), EP and larvae (L), as well as PH and L; meanwhile, 1595, 2540 and 680 DEGs were annotated, respectively. The fundamental developmental genes related to apoptosis, neurogenesis, and segmentation, as well as signaling pathways related to Hedgehog, MAPK, Wnt, TGF-β and Notch, showed higher expression during the EP stage than in other two stages, indicating that the EP stage has more active biological processes than the latter stages. This transcriptome studies gene expression at different stages of embryonic development and the datasets provide a basis for understanding crustacean developmental biology and guiding seedling production.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.