Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31724048›Full record

ReviewClinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America2019

Pathogen-focused Clinical Development to Address Unmet Medical Need: Cefiderocol Targeting Carbapenem Resistance.

Roger Echols, Mari Ariyasu, Tsutae Den Nagata

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Drug-resistantClinical microbiology reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Siderophore cephalosporins.EcoSal Plus · 2025
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Cefiderocol: A New Cephalosporin Stratagem Against Multidrug-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacteria.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2022
    Review
  10. Microbiology spectrum · 2022
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Is it time to move away from polymyxins?: evidence and alternatives.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2021
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Cefiderocol: Discovery, Chemistry, and In Vivo Profiles of a Novel Siderophore Cephalosporin.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2019
    Review
  18. Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Profiles of Cefiderocol, a Novel Siderophore Cephalosporin.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2019
    Review
  19. Cefiderocol: A Novel Siderophore Cephalosporin Defeating Carbapenem-resistant Pathogens.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Roger EcholsInfectious Disease Drug Development Consulting, LLC, Easton, Connecticut.
Mari AriyasuGlobal Development, Shionogi & Co, Ltd, Osaka, Japan.
Tsutae Den NagataGlobal Development, Shionogi & Co, Ltd, Osaka, Japan.
Shionogi (Japan) · JPInfectious Disease Consultants · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Historically, the regulatory requirements of the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Medicines Agency (EMA) for developing new antibiotics have not addressed pathogen-focused indications for drug approval. The design of the necessary randomized controlled trials traditionally involves the enrollment of patients with site-specific infections caused by susceptible as well as resistant pathogens. Cefiderocol has undergone a streamlined clinical development program to address serious carbapenem-resistant infections. The regulatory approach, and the pivotal clinical trials, differed between the FDA and EMA. In the United States, the APEKS-cUTI (Acinetobacter, Pseudomonas, Escherichia coli, Klebsiella, Stenotrophomonas-complicated urinary tract infection) study was conducted to provide the basis for FDA approval of a site-specific cUTI indication. The EMA, however, preferred the CREDIBLE-CR (A MultiCenter, RandomizED, Open-label ClInical Study of S-649266 or Best AvailabLE Therapy for the Treatment of Severe Infections Caused by Carbapenem-Resistant Gram-negative Pathogens) study, in which patients with nosocomial pneumonia, bloodstream infections, or cUTIs were enrolled if they had a carbapenem-resistant pathogen. The resulting European label will be pathogen focused rather than infection site specific (ie, treatment of gram-negative infection in patients with limited treatment options). The implications and limitations of these different regulatory processes are discussed.

Indexed as

Drug ApprovalDrug Resistance, BacterialAnti-Bacterial AgentsCarbapenemsCefiderocolCephalosporinsClinical Trials as TopicEuropeHumansUnited StatesUnited States Food and Drug AdministrationAnti-Bacterial AgentsCarbapenemsCefiderocolCephalosporinscarbapenem resistancecefiderocolnonfermenterspathogen-focused drug developmentregulatory drug approval

Identifiers

PMID31724048
PMCPMC6853756
OpenAlexW2985519891

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.