Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31723937›Full record

ArticleGynecology and pelvic medicine2019

Reasons that should prompt a referral to a reproductive urologist: guidelines for the gynecologist and reproductive endocrinologist.

Nicholas J Farber, Vinayak K Madhusoodanan, Sabrina A Gerkowicz, Premal Patel, Ranjith Ramasamy

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gynecology and pelvic medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Nicholas J FarberDepartment of Urology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, The Glickman Urological & Kidney Institute, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Vinayak K MadhusoodananDepartment of Urology, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA.
Sabrina A GerkowiczIVFMD, Miami, FL, USA.
Premal PatelDepartment of Urology, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA.
Ranjith RamasamyDepartment of Urology, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA.
University of Miami · USCleveland Clinic · USFoundation for Reproductive Medicine · US

Funding

Miami Clinical and Translational Science InstituteUL1TR002736 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI CARRASQUILLO, OLVEEN, KOBETZ, ERIN N · 2018 to 2022
$23.2M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002736
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Obstetricians and gynecologists, and in particular reproductive endocrinologists (REIs), are typically the gatekeepers and first-line providers for couples initially seeking an infertility evaluation. A timely referral to a reproductive urologist may improve pregnancy outcomes in certain clinical scenarios. This review examines the evidence behind circumstances requiring referral and delivers practice-based recommendations on commonly encountered scenarios in the clinic. Scenarios that should prompt referral to a reproductive urologist include semen analysis (SA) abnormalities (e.g., asthenozoospermia, azoospermia, globozoospermia, leukocytospermia, necrozoospermia, oligospermia), recurrent intrauterine insemination (IUI)/in vitro fertilization (IVF) failure, and idiopathic recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL). Conversely, deferment is appropriate in the cases of isolated teratozoospermia and subclinical varicocele. Men with infertility are also at higher risk for other comorbid conditions and should have at least a baseline evaluation by a primary care physician. Coordination of care between a REI and reproductive urologist is critical in several clinical scenarios and expedient referral can improve reproductive outcomes.

Indexed as

azoospermiaintrauterine insemination failure (IUI failure)in vitro fertilization failure (IVF failure)male infertilityRecurrent pregnancy loss (RPL)sperm aneuploidysperm DNA fragmentation

Identifiers

PMID31723937
PMCPMC6853630
OpenAlexW2981806019

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.