Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31723875›Full record

ArticleAcute and critical care2018

Characteristics and Clinical Outcomes of Critically Ill Cancer Patients Admitted to Korean Intensive Care Units.

Soo Jin Na, Tae Sun Ha, Younsuck Koh, Gee Young Suh, Shin Ok Koh, Chae-Man Lim, Won-Il Choi, Young-Joo Lee, Seok Chan Kim, Gyu Rak Chon and 12 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acute and critical care, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Clinico-demographic and Outcome Predictors in Solid Tumor Patients with Unplanned Intensive Care Unit Admissions: An Observational Study.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 13 institutions in 1 country.

Soo Jin NaDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Tae Sun HaDepartment of Surgery, Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital, Bucheon, Korea.
Younsuck KohDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Gee Young SuhDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Shin Ok KohDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Anesthesia and Pain Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Chae-Man LimDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Won-Il ChoiDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Dongsan Hospital, Keimyung University, Daegu, Korea.
Young-Joo LeeDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Ewha Womans University Mokdong Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Seok Chan KimDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.
Gyu Rak ChonDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Chungju Hospital, Konkuk University School of Medicine, Chungju, Korea.
Je Hyeong KimDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Ansan, Korea.
Jae Yeol KimDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Jaemin LimDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Gangneung Asan Hospital, University of Ulsan Medical College of Medicine, Gangneung, Korea.
Sunghoon ParkDepartment of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care Medicine, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Anyang, Korea.
Ho Cheol KimDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, Gyeongsang Institute of Health Sciences, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju, Korea.
Jin Hwa LeeDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Ewha Womans University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Ji Hyun LeeDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, CHA Bundang Hospital, CHA University, Seongnam, Korea.
Jisook ParkDepartment of Multimedia, Seoul Women's University, Seoul, Korea.
Juhee ChoSamsung Advanced Institute of Health Science and Technology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Kyeongman JeonDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-4822-1772
Validation of Simplified Acute Physiology Score 3 in Korean Intensive care unit (VSKI) study group
Korean Study Group On Respiratory Failure (KOSREF)
Samsung Medical Center · KREwha Womans University · KRKorea University · KRUlsan College · KRGyeongsang National University · KRHallym University Sacred Heart Hospital · KRKeimyung University · KRKonkuk University · KRSeoul Women's University · KRSoonchunhyang University · KRThe Catholic University of Korea Seoul St. Mary's Hospital · KRUniversity of Ulsan · KRYonsei University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe objective of this study was to investigate the characteristics and clinical outcomes of critically ill cancer patients admitted to intensive care units (ICUs) in Korea.

methodsThis was a retrospective cohort study that analyzed prospective collected data from the Validation of Simplified Acute Physiology Score 3 (SAPS3) in Korean ICU (VSKI) study, which is a nationwide, multicenter, and prospective study that considered 5,063 patients from 22 ICUs in Korea over a period of 7 months. Among them, patients older than 18 years of age who were diagnosed with solid or hematologic malignancies prior to admission to the ICU were included in the present study.

resultsDuring the study period, a total of 1,762 cancer patients were admitted to the ICUs and 833 of them were deemed eligible for analysis. Six hundred fifty-eight (79%) had solid tumors and 175 (21%) had hematologic malignancies, respectively. Respiratory problems (30.1%) was the most common reason leading to ICU admission. Patients with hematologic malignancies had higher Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (12 vs. 8, P<0.001) and SAPS3 (71 vs. 69, P<0.001) values and were more likely to be associated with chemotherapy, steroid therapy, and immunocompromised status versus patients with solid tumors. The use of inotropes/vasopressors, mechanical ventilation, and/or continuous renal replacement therapy was more frequently required in hematologic malignancy patients. Mortality rates in the ICU (41.7% vs. 24.6%, P<0.001) and hospital (53.1% vs. 38.6%, P=0.002) were higher in hematologic malignancy patients than in solid tumor patients.

conclusionsCancer patients accounted for one-third of all patients admitted to the studied ICUs in Korea. Clinical characteristics were different according to the type of malignancy. Patients with hematologic malignancies had a worse prognosis than did patients with solid tumor.

Indexed as

cancercritical careepidemiologyhematologic neoplasmmortality

Identifiers

PMID31723875
PMCPMC6786698
OpenAlexW2889049452

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.