Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31723844›Full record

ArticleHemaSphere2019

Transcriptomic and Epigenomic Profiling of Histone Deacetylase Inhibitor Treatment Reveals Distinct Gene Regulation Profiles Leading to Impaired Neutrophil Development.

Anita M A P Govers, Caroline R M Wiggers, Ruben van Boxtel, Michal Mokry, Edward E S Nieuwenhuis, Menno P Creyghton, Marije Bartels, Paul J Coffer

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in HemaSphere, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. RNA Polymerase II coordinates histone deacetylation at active promoters.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Anita M A P GoversCenter for Molecular Medicine and Regenerative Medicine Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Caroline R M WiggersDivision of Pediatrics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Ruben van BoxtelCenter for Molecular Medicine and Regenerative Medicine Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Michal MokryDivision of Pediatrics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Edward E S NieuwenhuisDivision of Pediatrics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Menno P CreyghtonHubrecht Institute-KNAW & University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Marije BartelsDivision of Pediatrics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Paul J CofferCenter for Molecular Medicine and Regenerative Medicine Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Utrecht University · NLHubrecht Institute for Developmental Biology and Stem Cell Research · NLUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The clinical use of histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACi) for the treatment of bone marrow failure and hematopoietic malignancies has increased dramatically over the last decades. Nonetheless, their effects on normal myelopoiesis remain poorly evaluated. Here, we treated cord blood derived CD34+ progenitor cells with two chemically distinct HDACi inhibitors MS-275 or SAHA and analyzed their effects on the transcriptome (RNA-seq), epigenome (H3K27ac ChIP-seq) and functional and morphological characteristics during neutrophil development. MS-275 (entinostat) selectively inhibits class I HDACs, with a preference for HDAC1, while SAHA (vorinostat) is a non-selective class I/II HDACi. Treatment with individual HDACi resulted in both overlapping and distinct effects on both transcriptome and epigenome, whereas functional effects were relatively similar. Both HDACi resulted in reduced expansion and increased apoptosis in neutrophil progenitor cells. Morphologically, HDACi disrupted normal neutrophil differentiation what was illustrated by decreased percentages of mature neutrophils. In addition, while SAHA treatment clearly showed a block at the promyelocytic stage, MS-275 treatment was characterized by dysplastic features and skewing towards the monocytic lineage. These effects could be mimicked using shRNA-mediated knockdown of HDAC1. Taken together, our data provide novel insights into the effects of HDAC inhibition on normal hematopoietic cells during neutrophil differentiation. These findings should be taken into account when considering the clinical use of MS-275 and SAHA, and can be potentially utilized to tailor more specific, hematopoietic-directed HDACi in the future.

Identifiers

PMID31723844
PMCPMC6745919
OpenAlexW2962695248

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.