ArticleHemaSphere2018
Clinical Utility of Next-generation Sequencing in the Management of Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: A Single-Center Experience.
Article in HemaSphere, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- Molecular landscape of non-driver genes in myeloproliferative neoplasms through 333 cancer genes panel: Insights to reveal in Pakistan.BMC medical genomics · 2025Article
- Genetic Landscape and Risk Stratification of AML With Hyperdiploid Karyotype.European journal of haematology · 2025Article
- Genomic Profile and Clinical Outcomes in Acute Myeloid Leukemia with Monosomal Karyotype.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Proposed Refinement of 2022 European LeukemiaNet Adverse-Risk Group of AML Patients Using a Real-World Cohort.Cancers · 2025Article
- A real-world analysis of clinical outcomes in AML with myelodysplasia-related changes: a comparison of ICC and WHO-HAEM5 criteria.Blood advances · 2024Article
- Molecular Genetic Profile of Myelofibrosis: Implications in the Diagnosis, Prognosis, and Treatment Advancements.Cancers · 2024Review
- Article
- Molecular characterization of triple-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms by next-generation sequencing.Annals of hematology · 2022Article
- Next-Generation Sequencing Panel Test in Myeloid Neoplasms and Evaluation with the Clinical Results.The Eurasian journal of medicine · 2022Article
- Cardiovascular Disease Among Patients With AML and CHIP-Related Mutations.JACC. CardioOncology · 2022Article
- Concordance of Peripheral Blood and Bone Marrow Next-Generation Sequencing in Hematologic Neoplasms.Advances in hematology · 2022Article
- The diagnostic role of Next Generation Sequencing in uncovering isolated splenomegaly: A case report.Hematology reports · 2021Article
- Review
- The Myeloproliferative Neoplasm Landscape: A Patient's Eye View.Advances in therapy · 2020Review
- Challenges in the introduction of next-generation sequencing (NGS) for diagnostics of myeloid malignancies into clinical routine use.Blood cancer journal · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although next-generation sequencing (NGS) has helped characterize the complex genomic landscape of myeloid malignancies, its clinical utility remains undefined. This has resulted in variable funding for NGS testing, limiting its accessibility. At our center, targeted sequencing (TAR-SEQ) using a 54-gene NGS myeloid panel is offered to all new patients referred for myeloid malignancies, as part of a prospective observational study. Here, we evaluated the diagnostic, prognostic, and potential therapeutic utility of clinical grade TAR-SEQ in the routine workflow of 179 patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN). Of 13 patients with triple negative (TN) MPN, who lacked driver mutations in
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.