Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31723668›Full record

ArticleJournal of dental anesthesia and pain medicine2019

Comparative evaluation of virtual reality distraction and counter-stimulation on dental anxiety and pain perception in children.

Mahesh Nunna, Rupak Kumar Dasaraju, Rekhalakshmi Kamatham, Sreekanth Kumar Mallineni, Sivakumar Nuvvula

4 registry-linked trialsOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of dental anesthesia and pain medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 4 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 46 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
7.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05083988 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Effect of Virtual Reality Distraction Versus Audio Distraction on Anxiety and Pain Reduction in Children Undergoing Dental Treatment (A Randomized Clinical Trial)

TypeinterventionalSponsorCairo UniversityRan2022 to 2022Enrolled44ConditionsDental AnxietyArmsvirtual reality glasses, music
NCT05157438 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Comparative Evaluation of The Effect of Virtual Reality and Screen Programs on Children's Dental Anxiety, Pain and Behavior: A Randomized Cross-Over Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorCairo UniversityRan2023 to 2024Enrolled42ConditionsDental AnxietyArmsvirtual reality device, screen programs
NCT05898100 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Effects of The Virtual Reality "Dream" Game on Anxiety During Dental Procedures in Children (VR-TOOTH): A Pilot Randomized, Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorSt. Justine's HospitalRan2023 to 2024Enrolled25ConditionsDental Anxiety, Dental Phobia, Dental Trauma, Dental DiseasesArmsVirtual Reality Distraction, Dental Clinic's Standard Treatment
NCT06182462 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

The Effects of A Virtual Reality Game on Anxiety During Dental Procedures in Children (VR-TOOTH): A Randomized, Controlled Trial Protocol

TypeinterventionalSponsorSt. Justine's HospitalRan2023 to 2026Enrolled88ConditionsDental Anxiety, Dental Phobia, Dental Trauma, Dental DiseasesArmsVirtual Reality Distraction, Dental Clinic's Standard Treatment
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 84 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Behavior Puzzle: Nonpharmacological Behavior Management.International journal of clinical pediatric dentistry · 2025
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Mahesh NunnaDepartment of Paedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, Narayana Dental College, Nellore, India.
Rupak Kumar DasarajuDepartment of Paedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, Priyadarshini Dental College and Hospital, Thiruvallur, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8820-941X
Rekhalakshmi KamathamDepartment of Paedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, Narayana Dental College, Nellore, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5715-4620
Sreekanth Kumar MallineniDepartment of Paedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, Narayana Dental College, Nellore, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9432-2590
Sivakumar NuvvulaDepartment of Paedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, Narayana Dental College, Nellore, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1204-5551
Narayana Dental College and Hospital · INGovt. Dental College & Hospital · INMajmaah University · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study evaluated the efficacy of virtual reality (VR) distraction and counter-stimulation (CS) on dental anxiety and pain perception to local anesthesia in children.

methodsA prospective, randomized, single-blinded interventional clinical trial with a parallel design was used. Seventy children 7-11 years old who required local anesthesia (LA) for pulp therapy or tooth extraction were recruited and allocated to two groups with equal distribution based on the intervention. Group CS (n = 35) received CS and Group VR (n = 35) received VR distraction with ANTVR glasses. Anxiety levels (using pulse rate) were evaluated before, during, and after administration of local anesthesia, while pain perception was assessed immediately after the injection. Wong-Baker faces pain-rating scale (WBFPS), visual analog scale (VAS), and Venham's clinical anxiety rating scale (VCARS) were used for pain evaluation. Student's t-test was used to test the mean difference between groups, and repeated measures ANOVA was used to test the mean difference of pulse rates.

resultsSignificant differences in mean pulse rates were observed in both groups, while children in the VR group had a higher reduction (P < 0.05), and the mean VCARS scores were significant in the VR group (P < 0.05). Mean WBFPS scores showed less pain perception to LA needle prick in the CS group while the same change was observed in the VR group with VAS scores.

conclusionsVR distraction is better than CS for reducing anxiety to injection in children undergoing extraction and pulpectomy.

Indexed as

Counter-StimulationDental AnxietyDistractionPain PerceptionVirtual Reality

Identifiers

PMID31723668
PMCPMC6834716
OpenAlexW2987004753

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.