Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31723666›Full record

ArticleJournal of dental anesthesia and pain medicine2019

Resistance to local anesthesia in people with the Ehlers-Danlos Syndromes presenting for dental surgery.

Jane R Schubart, Eric Schaefer, Piotr Janicki, Sanjib D Adhikary, Amber Schilling, Alan J Hakim, Rebecca Bascom, Clair A Francomano, Satish R Raj

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of dental anesthesia and pain medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. A new academic leap in the fields of anesthesia and pain management in dentistry.Journal of dental anesthesia and pain medicine · 2024
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Oral manifestations of Ehlers-Danlos syndromes.American journal of medical genetics. Part C, Seminars in medical genetics · 2021
    Review
  16. Hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos syndromes: Complex phenotypes, challenging diagnoses, and poorly understood causes.Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists · 2021
    Review
  17. Ehlers-Danlos syndrome.British dental journal · 2020
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jane R SchubartDepartment of Surgery, The Pennsylvania State University, College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9334-6892
Eric SchaeferDepartment of Public Health Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA.
Piotr JanickiDepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, The Pennsylvania State University, College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7167-1184
Sanjib D AdhikaryDepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, The Pennsylvania State University, College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1733-4192
Amber SchillingDepartment of Surgery, The Pennsylvania State University, College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9852-6462
Alan J HakimThe Wellington Hospital, Platinum Medical Centre, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7170-1697
Rebecca BascomDepartment of Public Health Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5875-3476
Clair A FrancomanoMedical and Molecular Genetics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4032-7425
Satish R RajVanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5890-3785

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPeople with the Ehlers-Danlos Syndromes (EDS), a group of heritable disorders of connective tissue, often report experiencing dental procedure pain despite local anesthetic (LA) use. Clinicians have been uncertain how to interpret this apparent LA resistance, as comparison of EDS and non-EDS patient experience is limited to anecdotal evidence and small case series. The primary goal of this hypothesis-generating study was to investigate the recalled adequacy of pain prevention with LA administered during dental procedures in a large cohort of people with and without EDS. A secondary exploratory aim asked people with EDS to recall comparative LA experiences.

methodsWe administered an online survey through various social media platforms to people with EDS and their friends without EDS, asking about past dental procedures, LA exposures, and the adequacy of procedure pain prevention. Among EDS respondents who both received LA and recalled the specific LA used, we compared agent-specific pain prevention for lidocaine, procaine, bupivacaine, mepivacaine, and articaine.

resultsAmong the 980 EDS respondents who had undergone a dental procedure LA, 88% (n = 860) recalled inadequate pain prevention. Among 249 non EDS respondents only 33% (n = 83) recalled inadequate pain prevention (P < 0.001 compared to EDS respondents). The agent with the highest EDS-respondent reported success rate was articaine (30%), followed by bupivacaine (25%), and mepivacaine (22%).

conclusionsEDS survey respondents reported nearly three times the rate of LA non-response compared to non-EDS respondents, suggesting that LAs were less effective in preventing their pain associated with routine office dental procedures.

Indexed as

Dental CareEhlers-Danlos SyndromeLocal Anesthetics

Identifiers

PMID31723666
PMCPMC6834718

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.