Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31723495›Full record

ArticleCureus2019

A Pediatric Case of Accidental Eucalyptus Oil Poisoning from New Delhi, India: Emergency Measures, Historical Context, and Implications for Practice.

Ramakrishnan Sitaraman, Gangotri Rao

Open access · diamondAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ramakrishnan SitaramanBiotechnology, TERI School of Advanced Studies, New Delhi, IND.
Gangotri RaoPediatrics, Aashlok Hospital, New Delhi, IND.
Bapu Nature Cure Hospital & Yogashram · INTERI University · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Eucalyptus oil (EO) and EO containing products are readily available worldwide over the counter as topical nasal decongestants, rubefacients, anti-pyretics, and anti-inflammatory agents. However, EO is poisonous when orally ingested, or otherwise internally administered, resulting in serious outcomes such as seizures, vomiting, drowsiness, and even death. In this case report, we describe emergency measures adopted in a suspected case of EO ingestion by a 17-month-old female infant. It was found that stomach washes with normal saline followed by the oral administration of ranitidine to prevent vomiting restored and maintained normalcy over a 24-hour period. We situate our experience within the Indian context and recommend that pediatricians and healthcare workers routinely and explicitly warn parents about the serious consequences of the incorrect usage of substances containing essential oils in general and EO in particular.

Indexed as

accidental ingestionessential oilessential oil toxicityeucalyptus oilpoisoning

Identifiers

PMID31723495
PMCPMC6825461
OpenAlexW2975530071

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.