Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31723493›Full record

ReviewCureus2019

Acquiring and Maintaining Technical Skills Using Simulation: Initial, Maintenance, Booster, and Refresher Training.

Anne Sullivan, Summer Elshenawy, Anne Ades, Taylor Sawyer

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05775029 (Rapid Sequence Induction Checklist and Its Effect on Compliance to Guidelines and Complications - Follow-up), which is not on this map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05775029 active not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Rapid Sequence Induction Checklist and Its Effect on Compliance to Guidelines and Complications - Follow-up

TypeobservationalSponsorJakob ZeuchnerRan2022 to 2025Enrolled2,300ConditionsRSI, Rapid Sequence Induction, Complication of Anesthesia, Compliant Behavior
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. E-learning use in the review of neonatal resuscitation program in physicians: a scoping review.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Anne SullivanPediatrics: Neonatology, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA.
Summer ElshenawyPediatrics: Neonatology, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, USA.
Anne AdesPediatrics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, USA.
Taylor SawyerPediatrics, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Simulation-based education has been shown to be an effective tool to mitigate skill decay. However, many of the strategies reported in the literature have overlapping terminology with little consensus on the timing of the strategy to prevent skill decay. In this review, we propose and provide a standardized nomenclature and framework for simulation strategies used to obtain, maintain, or regain skills that are decaying. This framework delineates four types of training: initial, maintenance, booster, and refresher. The framework differentiates these training types based on the learner competency at the time of the training, as well as the frequency and intensity of the training. Initial training is aimed at "novice" learners with the goal to achieve competency. Once competency is achieved, maintenance training prevents skill deterioration through low-dose high-frequency (LDHF) training. Booster training is used when the learner is still proficient, but competency begins to wane. Booster training occurs less frequently than maintenance training but with greater intensity to overcome the skill decay that occurs over time. Refresher training is aimed at re-establishing skill levels after competency has reached unsatisfactory levels. Refresher training is higher intensity than booster and maintenance training. We describe simulation-based strategies reported in the literature that can be used for each type of training. We conclude that there should be an increased emphasis in medical education towards maintenance and booster training in order to preserve skills before competency is lost.

Indexed as

booster trainingcompetency-based medical educationmedical educationrefresher trainingsimulationsimulation based medical educationskill maintenanceskills training

Identifiers

PMID31723493
PMCPMC6825451

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.