ArticleF1000Research2019
Creating and sharing reproducible research code the workflowr way.
Article in F1000Research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
35 citing papers in PubMed.
- Progressive suppression of DNA repair genes with persistent p53 target activation in doxorubicin-treated cardiomyocytes.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2026Article
- CX-5461 and doxorubicin activate a shared DNA damage-associated transcriptional response in human cardiomyocytes.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2026Article
- Non-negative matrix factorization algorithms generally improve topic model fits.Statistics and computing · 2026Article
- Anthracyclines induce global changes in cardiomyocyte chromatin accessibility that overlap with cardiovascular disease loci.PLoS genetics · 2025Article
- Article
- DNA-damage-associated protein co-expression network in cardiomyocytes informs on tolerance to genetic variation and disease.iScience · 2025Article
- Machine learning derived retinal pigment score from ophthalmic imaging shows ethnicity is not biology.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Ten simple rules for building and maintaining a responsible data science workflow.PLoS computational biology · 2024Article
- Library size confounds biology in spatial transcriptomics data.Genome biology · 2024Article
- SuperCellCyto: enabling efficient analysis of large scale cytometry datasets.Genome biology · 2024Article
- Molecularly stratified hypothalamic astrocytes are cellular foci for obesity.Research square · 2024Article
- Rapidly scalable and low-cost public health surveillance reporting system for COVID-19.BMJ health & care informatics · 2024Article
- Multifunctional cytokine production marks influenza A virus-specific CD4 T cells with high expression of survival molecules.European journal of immunology · 2023Article
- GoM DE: interpreting structure in sequence count data with differential expression analysis allowing for grades of membership.Genome biology · 2023Article
- The five pillars of computational reproducibility: bioinformatics and beyond.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2023Article
- GoM DE: interpreting structure in sequence count data with differential expression analysis allowing for grades of membership.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- UK Biobank retinal imaging grading: methodology, baseline characteristics and findings for common ocular diseases.Eye (London, England) · 2023Article
- sgcocaller and comapr: personalised haplotype assembly and comparative crossover map analysis using single-gamete sequencing data.Nucleic acids research · 2022Article
- Genomic Landscapes and Hallmarks of Mutant RAS in Human Cancers.Cancer research · 2022Article
- propeller: testing for differences in cell type proportions in single cell data.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Making scientific analyses reproducible, well documented, and easily shareable is crucial to maximizing their impact and ensuring that others can build on them. However, accomplishing these goals is not easy, requiring careful attention to organization, workflow, and familiarity with tools that are not a regular part of every scientist's toolbox. We have developed an R package,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.