Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31723318›Full record

ArticleBehavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology

The costs and benefits of decentralization and centralization of ant colonies.

Dominic D R Burns, Jon W Pitchford, Catherine L Parr, Daniel W Franks, Elva J H Robinson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The costs and benefits of decentralization and centralization of ant colonies.Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Dominic D R BurnsDepartment of Biology, Wentworth Way, University of York, York, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2299-2453
Jon W PitchfordDepartment of Biology, Wentworth Way, University of York, York, UK.
Catherine L ParrDepartment of Earth, Ocean and Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Jane Herdman Building, Liverpool, UK.
Daniel W FranksDepartment of Biology, Wentworth Way, University of York, York, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4832-7470
Elva J H RobinsonDepartment of Biology, Wentworth Way, University of York, York, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A challenge faced by individuals and groups of many species is determining how resources and activities should be spatially distributed: centralized or decentralized. This distribution problem is hard to understand due to the many costs and benefits of each strategy in different settings. Ant colonies are faced by this problem and demonstrate two solutions: 1) centralizing resources in a single nest (monodomy) and 2) decentralizing by spreading resources across many nests (polydomy). Despite the possibilities for using this system to study the centralization/decentralization problem, the trade-offs associated with using either polydomy or monodomy are poorly understood due to a lack of empirical data and cohesive theory. Here, we present a dynamic network model of a population of ant nests which is based on observations of a facultatively polydomous ant species (

Indexed as

collective decision-makingdecentralizationdynamic networkspolydomysocial insectssocial networks

Identifiers

PMID31723318
PMCPMC6838651

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.