Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31723301›Full record

ArticleNature protocols2019

Native internally calibrated chromatin immunoprecipitation for quantitative studies of histone post-translational modifications.

Adrian T Grzybowski, Rohan N Shah, William F Richter, Alexander J Ruthenburg

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature protocols, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Binding mode-guided development of high-performance antibodies targeting site-specific posttranslational modifications.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Chromatin Immunoprecipitation (ChIP) to Study DNA-Protein Interactions.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2021
    Article
  12. A physical basis for quantitative ChIP-sequencing.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Adrian T Grzybowski *Department of Molecular Genetics and Cell Biology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Rohan N Shah *Department of Molecular Genetics and Cell Biology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
William F RichterDepartment of Molecular Genetics and Cell Biology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Alexander J RuthenburgDepartment of Molecular Genetics and Cell Biology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA. aruthenburg@uchicago.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2709-4564
University of Chicago · US

Funding

Quantitatively probing intra-nucleosomal chromatin variation and functionR01GM115945 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI RUTHENBURG, ALEXANDER JACKSON · 2016 to 2020
$1.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM115945
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chromatin immunoprecipitation coupled to next-generation sequencing (ChIP-seq) has served as the central method for the study of histone modifications for the past decade. In ChIP-seq analyses, antibodies selectively capture nucleosomes bearing a modification of interest and the associated DNA is then mapped to the genome to determine the distribution of the mark. This approach has several important drawbacks: (i) ChIP interpretation necessitates the assumption of perfect antibody specificity, despite growing evidence that this is often not the case. (ii) Common methods for evaluating antibody specificity in other formats have little or no bearing on specificity within a ChIP experiment. (iii) Uncalibrated ChIP is reported as relative enrichment, which is biologically meaningless outside the experimental reference frame defined by a discrete immunoprecipitation (IP), thus preventing facile comparison across experimental conditions or modifications. (iv) Differential library amplification and loading onto next-generation sequencers, as well as computational normalization, can further compromise quantitative relationships that may exist between samples. Consequently, the researcher is presented with a series of potential pitfalls and is blind to nearly all of them. Here we provide a detailed protocol for internally calibrated ChIP (ICeChIP), a method we recently developed to resolve these problems by spike-in of defined nucleosomal standards within a ChIP procedure. This protocol is optimized for specificity and quantitative power, allowing for measurement of antibody specificity and absolute measurement of histone modification density (HMD) at genomic loci on a biologically meaningful scale enabling unambiguous comparisons. We provide guidance on optimal conditions for next-generation sequencing (NGS) and instructions for data analysis. This protocol takes between 17 and 18 h, excluding time for sequencing or bioinformatic analysis. The ICeChIP procedure enables accurate measurement of histone post-translational modifications (PTMs) genome-wide in mammalian cells as well as Drosophila melanogaster and Caenorhabditis elegans, indicating suitability for use in eukaryotic cells more broadly.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntibody SpecificityCaenorhabditis elegansCalibrationChromatin ImmunoprecipitationChromatin Immunoprecipitation SequencingComputational BiologyDNADrosophila melanogasterGene LibraryGenomeHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHistonesHumansNucleosomesProtein Processing, Post-TranslationalDNAHistonesNucleosomes

Identifiers

PMID31723301
PMCPMC7158589
OpenAlexW2983675607

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.