ArticleEye (London, England)2020
Retinal nerve fibre layer thickness in a normal black South African population.
Article in Eye (London, England), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Optic nerve sheath diameter measurement in healthy South Iranian adults from a cross-sectional ultrasonographic study.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter: A Cross-Sectional Study of Ultrasonographic Measurement in Healthy Black South African Adults.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Retinal nerve fibre layer thickness measured with SD-OCT in a population-based study: the Handan Eye Study.The British journal of ophthalmology · 2023Article
- Article
- Distribution and Classification of Peripapillary Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness in Healthy Young Adults.Translational vision science & technology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe measurement of retinal nerve fibre layer (RNFL) thickness on spectral domain OCT (SD-OCT) are compared with built-in age- and gender-matched European normative databases and this difference is used to assist with glaucoma diagnosis. However, there are differences in RNFL thickness between population groups. Therefore, using the built in European normative database as a comparison across all population groups could lead to erroneous results, due to the basic assumption that the normative values for non-European populations are the same as their European counterparts.
methodsCross-sectional study of RNFL thickness in normal black South African patients.
resultsOne hundred and thirty-two eyes of 132 patients were enroled in this study. The mean (SD) age of patients in this study was 41.3 (12.5) years. Males comprised 40.9% (n = 54; p = 0.0367). All RNFL sectors except the temporal sector were significantly thicker than the reference database. The RNFL sectors measured as follows: global (108.7 µm, p < 0.001), superotemporal (152.4 µm, p < 0.001), superonasal (132.6 µm, p < 0.001), inferotemporal (150.1 µm, p < 0.001), inferonasal (129.2 µm, p < 0.001), nasal (77.7 µm, p < 0.001), temporal 74.8 µm, p = 0.9534).
conclusionThe RNFL thickness of normal black South Africans is significantly thicker than that of the European database on the Spectralis SD-OCT. This needs to be taken into account when performing RNFL thickness measurements on black patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.