Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31723154›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Standardised Framework for Quantitative Analysis of Fibrillation Dynamics.

Xinyang Li, Caroline H Roney, Balvinder S Handa, Rasheda A Chowdhury, Steven A Niederer, Nicholas S Peters, Fu Siong Ng

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Evaluation of novel open-source software for cardiac optical mapping.Journal of molecular and cellular cardiology plus · 2024
    Article
  2. Optical mapping and optogenetics in cardiac electrophysiology research and therapy: a state-of-the-art review.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2024
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Xinyang LiNational Heart and Lung Institute, Hammersmith Campus, Imperial College London, 72 Du Cane Rd, London, W120UQ, UK.
Caroline H RoneySchool of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, St. Thomas' Hospital, Westminster Bridge Road, London, UK.
Balvinder S HandaNational Heart and Lung Institute, Hammersmith Campus, Imperial College London, 72 Du Cane Rd, London, W120UQ, UK.
Rasheda A ChowdhuryNational Heart and Lung Institute, Hammersmith Campus, Imperial College London, 72 Du Cane Rd, London, W120UQ, UK.
Steven A NiedererSchool of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, St. Thomas' Hospital, Westminster Bridge Road, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4612-6982
Nicholas S PetersNational Heart and Lung Institute, Hammersmith Campus, Imperial College London, 72 Du Cane Rd, London, W120UQ, UK.
Fu Siong NgNational Heart and Lung Institute, Hammersmith Campus, Imperial College London, 72 Du Cane Rd, London, W120UQ, UK. f.ng@imperial.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8681-4368
Imperial College London · GBSt Thomas' Hospital · GBHammersmith Hospital · GB

Funding

British Heart Foundation FS/15/25/31423British Heart Foundation PG/16/17/32069British Heart Foundation RG/16/3/32175British Heart Foundation (BHF) RG/16/3/32175Medical Research Council MR/S015086/1Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust WT 203148/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The analysis of complex mechanisms underlying ventricular fibrillation (VF) and atrial fibrillation (AF) requires sophisticated tools for studying spatio-temporal action potential (AP) propagation dynamics. However, fibrillation analysis tools are often custom-made or proprietary, and vary between research groups. With no optimal standardised framework for analysis, results from different studies have led to disparate findings. Given the technical gap, here we present a comprehensive framework and set of principles for quantifying properties of wavefront dynamics in phase-processed data recorded during myocardial fibrillation with potentiometric dyes. Phase transformation of the fibrillatory data is particularly useful for identifying self-perpetuating spiral waves or rotational drivers (RDs) rotating around a phase singularity (PS). RDs have been implicated in sustaining fibrillation, and thus accurate localisation and quantification of RDs is crucial for understanding specific fibrillatory mechanisms. In this work, we assess how variation of analysis parameters and thresholds in the tracking of PSs and quantification of RDs could result in different interpretations of the underlying fibrillation mechanism. These techniques have been described and applied to experimental AF and VF data, and AF simulations, and examples are provided from each of these data sets to demonstrate the range of fibrillatory behaviours and adaptability of these tools. The presented methodologies are available as an open source software and offer an off-the-shelf research toolkit for quantifying and analysing fibrillatory mechanisms.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsModels, CardiovascularAtrial FibrillationComputer SimulationHeart Conduction SystemHumansVentricular Fibrillation

Identifiers

PMID31723154
PMCPMC6853901
OpenAlexW2983011969

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.