Trial reportJCI insight2019
Phase 2a randomized, placebo-controlled study of anti-IL-33 in peanut allergy.
Trial report in JCI insight, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02920021 (Placebo-Controlled Proof of Concept Study to Investigate ANB020 Activity in Adult Patients With Peanut Allergy), which is not on this map. Cited by 94 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Placebo-Controlled Proof of Concept Study to Investigate ANB020 Activity in Adult Patients With Peanut Allergy
Who cites it
94 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 184 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effect of Dupilumab on Allergen-Specific IgE Levels and Clinical Tolerance in Patients with Food Allergy: A Systematic Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Pooled it
- Allergen immunotherapy and/or biologicals for IgE-mediated food allergy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Allergy · 2022Pooled it
- Guideline for the use of immunobiologicals in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) in Brazil.Brazilian journal of otorhinolaryngologyGuideline
- Evaluation of the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of SM17 in healthy volunteers: results from pre-clinical models and a first-in-human, randomized, double blinded clinical trial.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Trial
- Indications for Biological Treatment Combined with Allergen-Specific Immunotherapy: Who Is It Really Intended for?Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Diverging in Vivo Immune Response Patterns After Oral Food Challenge in Peanut Allergic Adults.Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2026Article
- Update on biologic and small molecules treatments in pediatric allergic diseases.Pediatric allergy and immunology : official publication of the European Society of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology · 2026Review
- Pathogenic type-2 immunity beyond allergy: the role of Th2 cell heterogeneity in helminth infections.Infection and immunity · 2026Review
- Advances in targeting IL-1 family cytokines for the treatment of inflammatory diseases.Nature reviews. Rheumatology · 2026Review
- Epithelial alarmins TSLP, IL-33, and IL-25 in asthma pathogenesis: mechanistic roles and therapeutic implications.Molecular biology reports · 2026Review
- Interleukin-33 Promotes Neutrophil Extracellular Trap Formation To Aggravate Renal Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury Through ST2/PI3K/Akt and ST2/PAD4 Pathways.Inflammation · 2026Article
- Interleukin-33 at the intersection of inflammation and repair.Frontiers in allergy · 2026Review
- Nanomaterial-Based Strategies Targeting IL-1 Signalling in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Therapeutic Applications and Mechanistic Insights.Journal of inflammation research · 2026Review
- Biologics in IgE-mediated food allergy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of interventional studies.The World Allergy Organization journal · 2025Review
- Biological mechanisms and therapeutic prospects of interleukin-33 in pathogenesis and treatment of allergic disease.Journal of inflammation (London, England) · 2025Review
- Recent Studies and Prospects of Biologics in Allergic Rhinitis Treatment.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Chinese Position Paper on Biologic Therapy for Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps.Allergy · 2025Review
- Targeting alarmins in asthma: From bench to clinic.The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology · 2025Review
- Scientific developments in understanding food allergy prevention, diagnosis, and treatment.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
- Emerging diagnostic and therapeutic opportunities in food allergy.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
34 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUNDIL-33, found in high levels in participants with allergic disorders, is thought to mediate allergic reactions. Etokimab, an anti-IL-33 biologic, has previously demonstrated a good safety profile and favorable pharmacodynamic properties in many clinical studies.METHODSIn this 6-week placebo-controlled phase 2a study, we evaluated the safety and the ability of a single dose of etokimab to desensitize peanut-allergic adults. Participants received either etokimab (n = 15) or blinded placebo (n = 5). Clinical tests included oral food challenges and skin prick tests at days 15 and 45. Blood samples were collected for IgE levels and measurement of ex vivo peanut-stimulated T cell cytokine production.RESULTSEfficacy measurements for active vs. placebo participants at the day 15 and 45 food challenge (tolerating a cumulative 275 mg of peanut protein, which was the food challenge outcome defined in this paper) demonstrated, respectively, 73% vs. 0% (P = 0.008) to 57% vs. 0% (ns). The etokimab group had fewer adverse events compared with placebo. IL-4, IL-5, IL-9, IL-13, and ST2 levels in CD4+ T cells were reduced in the active vs. placebo arm upon peanut-induced T cell activation (P = 0.036 for IL-13 and IL-9 at day 15), and peanut-specific IgE was reduced in active vs. placebo (P = 0.014 at day 15).CONCLUSIONThe phase 2a results suggest etokimab is safe and well tolerated and that a single dose of etokimab could have the potential to desensitize peanut-allergic participants and possibly reduce atopy-related adverse events.TRIAL REGISTRATIONClinicalTrials.gov NCT02920021.FUNDINGThis work was supported by NIH grant R01AI140134, AnaptysBio, the Hartman Vaccine Fund, and the Sean N. Parker Center for Allergy and Asthma Research at Stanford University.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.