ArticleBMJ quality & safety2020
Work systems analysis of sterile processing: decontamination.
Article in BMJ quality & safety, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Occupational Noise in the Central Sterile Supply Department: A Narrative Review of Exposure, Mechanisms, and Control.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Coordination patterns as markers of brittleness (and resilience) in complex systems: a sterile processing case study.Ergonomics · 2026Article
- Preventing Improperly Reprocessed Instruments.AORN journal · 2026Article
- A review of the sterile processing department's reprocessing of surgical instruments.International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care · 2026Review
- Energy Conservation and Emission Reduction in Central Sterile Supply Department Under High-Quality Development of Public Hospitals: A Narrative Review.Journal of healthcare leadership · 2026Review
- An investigation into cleaning quality of suction-type metal lumen instruments: a cross-sectional study.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- A spectrophotometric method for determining residual protein levels on reusable surgical instruments: a comparison of six washing methods of instruments with an internal lumen.GMS hygiene and infection control · 2025Article
- Assessing the Effects of Surgical Irrigation Solutions on Human Neutrophil Interactions with NascentMicroorganisms · 2024Article
- Revealing complex interdependencies in surgical instrument reprocessing using SEIPS 101 tools.Applied ergonomics · 2024Article
- Human Factors Integration in Robotic Surgery.Human factors · 2024Review
- Effects of Time, Temperature, and Humidity on Soil Drying on Medical Devices.Biomedical instrumentation & technology · 2023Article
- The Supervision and Management Mode of Disinfection Supply Center Improves the Standardization of Sterile Goods Management in Clinical Departments.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2022Article
- How to specify healthcare process improvements collaboratively using rapid, remote consensus-building: a framework and a case study of its application.BMC medical research methodology · 2021Article
- Work systems analysis of sterile processing: assembly.BMJ quality & safety · 2021Article
- Frontiers in human factors: embedding specialists in multi-disciplinary efforts to improve healthcare.International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care · 2021Article
- Establishing Nursing-Sensitive Quality Indicators for the Central Sterile Supply Department: A Modified Delphi Study.Quality management in health careArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundFew studies have explored the work of sterile processing departments (SPD) from a systems perspective. Effective decontamination is critical for removing organic matter and reducing microbial levels from used surgical instruments prior to disinfection or sterilisation and is delivered through a combination of human work and supporting technologies and processes.
objectiveIn this paper we report the results of a work systems analysis that sought to identify the complex multilevel interdependencies that create performance variation in decontamination and identify potential improvement interventions.
methodsThe research was conducted at a 700-bed academic hospital with two reprocessing facilities decontaminating approximately 23 000 units each month. Mixed methods, including 56 hours of observations of work as done, formal and informal interviews with relevant stakeholders and analysis of data collected about the system, were used to iteratively develop a process map, task analysis, abstraction hierarchy and a variance matrix.
resultsWe identified 21 different performance shaping factors, 30 potential failures, 16 types of process variance, and 10 outcome variances in decontamination. Approximately 2% of trays were returned to decontamination from assembly, while decontamination problems were found in about 1% of surgical cases. Staff knowledge, production pressures, instrument design, tray composition and workstation design contributed to outcomes such as reduced throughput, tray defects, staff injuries, increased inventory and equipment costs, and patient injuries.
conclusionsEnsuring patients and technicians' safety and efficient SPD operation requires improved design of instruments and the decontamination area, skilled staff, proper equipment maintenance and effective coordination of reprocessing tasks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.