Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31722998›Full record

ArticleCancer research2020

Novel Mechanisms of Cancer Emerge When Accounting for Sex as a Biological Variable.

Melissa A Wilson, Kenneth H Buetow

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Sex-Biased Immunity: The Hidden Variable in Immuno-oncology.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Sex and gender differences in cancer pathogenesis and pharmacology.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Sex differences in drug effects and/or toxicity in oncology.Current research in pharmacology and drug discovery · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Melissa A WilsonSchool of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona.ORCID 0000-0002-2614-0285
Kenneth H BuetowSchool of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona. kenneth.buetow@asu.edu.

Funding

Population dynamics and medical consequences of sex chromosome evolutionR35GM124827 · NIGMS · ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY-TEMPE CAMPUS · PI WILSON, MELISSA A · 2017 to 2024
$2.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM124827
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is a large gap between the aspiration of considering sex as biological variable and the execution of such studies, particularly in genomic studies of human cancer. This represents a lost opportunity to identify sex-specific molecular etiologies that may underpin the dramatic sex differences in cancer incidence and outcome. There are conceptual and practical challenges associated with considering sex as a biological variable, including the definition of sex itself and the need for novel study designs. A better understanding of cancer mechanisms, resulting in improved outcomes, will reward the effort invested in incorporating sex as a biological variable.

Indexed as

Sex FactorsFemaleGenome-Wide Association StudyHumansMaleNeoplasmsPrecision MedicineResearch DesignTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID31722998
PMCPMC6942614

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.