Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31722942›Full record

SynthesisBMJ open2019

Epidemiology of placenta previa accreta: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Eric Jauniaux, Lene Grønbeck, Catey Bunce, Jens Langhoff-Roos, Sally L Collins

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05070689 (Placenta Accreta Spectrum Disorders), which is not on this map. Cited by 76 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
76citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
27.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05070689 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Placenta Accreta Spectrum Disorders: A. Chohan Continuous Squeezing Suture (ACCSS) for Controlling Haemorrahge From Lower Uterine Segment at Caesarean Section

TypeinterventionalSponsorSharif Medical Research CenterRan2021 to 2022Enrolled20ConditionsPlacenta AccretaArmsACCSS
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

76 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 191 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Placenta Praevia and Placenta Accreta Spectrum: Diagnosis and Management: Green-Top Guideline No. 27a.BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Hematologic markers and machine learning in predicting placenta accreta: A case-control study.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

16 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 5 countries.

Eric JauniauxEGA Institute for Women Health, UCL, London, UK e.jauniaux@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-0925-7737
Lene GrønbeckDepartment of Obstetrics, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Kobenhavns, Denmark.
Catey BuncePrimary Care and Public Health Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0935-3713
Jens Langhoff-RoosDepartement of Obstetrics, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Kobenhavn, Denmark.
Sally L CollinsNuffield Department of Women's and Reproductive Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
University of Copenhagen · DKKing's College London · GBUniversity College Lahore · PKUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo estimate the prevalence and incidence of placenta previa complicated by placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) and to examine the different criteria being used for the diagnosis.

designSystematic review and meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Google Scholar, ClinicalTrials.gov and MEDLINE were searched between August 1982 and September 2018. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Studies reporting on placenta previa complicated by PAS diagnosed in a defined obstetric population. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Two independent reviewers performed the data extraction using a predefined protocol and assessed the risk of bias using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for observational studies, with difference agreed by consensus. The primary outcomes were overall prevalence of placenta previa, incidence of PAS according to the type of placenta previa and the reported clinical outcomes, including the number of peripartum hysterectomies and direct maternal mortality. The secondary outcomes included the criteria used for the prenatal ultrasound diagnosis of placenta previa and the criteria used to diagnose and grade PAS at birth.

resultsA total of 258 articles were reviewed and 13 retrospective and 7 prospective studies were included in the analysis, which reported on 587 women with placenta previa and PAS. The meta-analysis indicated a significant (p<0.001) heterogeneity between study estimates for the prevalence of placenta previa, the prevalence of placenta previa with PAS and the incidence of PAS in the placenta previa cohort. The median prevalence of placenta previa was 0.56% (IQR 0.39-1.24) whereas the median prevalence of placenta previa with PAS was 0.07% (IQR 0.05-0.16). The incidence of PAS in women with a placenta previa was 11.10% (IQR 7.65-17.35).

conclusionsThe high heterogeneity in qualitative and diagnostic data between studies emphasises the need to implement standardised protocols for the diagnoses of both placenta previa and PAS, including the type of placenta previa and grade of villous invasiveness. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42017068589.

Indexed as

FemaleHumansHysterectomyIncidencePeripartum PeriodPlacenta AccretaPlacenta PreviaPregnancyPrevalenceUltrasonography, Prenatalincidencelow-lying placentaplacenta accreta spectrumplacenta previaprevalence

Identifiers

PMID31722942
PMCPMC6858111
OpenAlexW2986460764

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.