ArticleBiology direct2019
Environmental metagenome classification for constructing a microbiome fingerprint.
Article in Biology direct, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluation of targeted Massively Parallel Sequencing methods for forensic metagenomics.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2026Article
- Molecular Mechanisms of the Microbiota-Gut-Brain Axis in the Onset and Progression of Stroke.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Citywide metagenomic surveillance of food centres reveals local microbial signatures and antibiotic resistance gene enrichment.npj antimicrobials and resistance · 2025Article
- Exploring extreme environments in Türkiye for novel P450s through metagenomic analysis.PloS one · 2025Article
- Towards predicting the geographical origin of ancient samples with metagenomic data.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Assessment of Dust, Chemical, Microbiological Pollutions and Microclimatic Parameters of Indoor Air in Sports Facilities.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
- Serine and one-carbon metabolisms bring new therapeutic venues in prostate cancer.Discover oncology · 2021Review
- Emerging roles of the HECT-type E3 ubiquitin ligases in hematological malignancies.Discover oncology · 2021Review
- Recent advances in cancer immunotherapy.Discover oncology · 2021Review
- New immunological potential markers for triple negative breast cancer: IL18R1, CD53, TRIM, Jaw1, LTB, PTPRCAP.Discover oncology · 2021Article
- Metagenomic Geolocation Prediction Using an Adaptive Ensemble Classifier.Frontiers in genetics · 2021Article
- Liquid biopsies and cancer omics.Cell death discovery · 2020Review
- Commensal microbes and p53 in cancer progression.Biology direct · 2020Review
- Serological determinants of COVID-19.Biology direct · 2020Article
- Cancer predictive studies.Biology direct · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNowadays, not only are single genomes commonly analyzed, but also metagenomes, which are sets of, DNA fragments (reads) derived from microbes living in a given environment. Metagenome analysis is aimed at extracting crucial information on the organisms that have left their traces in an investigated environmental sample.In this study we focus on the MetaSUB Forensics Challenge (organized within the CAMDA 2018 conference) which consists in predicting the geographical origin of metagenomic samples. Contrary to the existing methods for environmental classification that are based on taxonomic or functional classification, we rely on the similarity between a sample and the reference database computed at a reads level.
resultsWe report the results of our extensive experimental study to investigate the behavior of our method and its sensitivity to different parameters. In our tests, we have followed the protocol of the MetaSUB Challenge, which allowed us to compare the obtained results with the solutions based on taxonomic and functional classification.
conclusionsThe results reported in the paper indicate that our method is competitive with those based on taxonomic classification. Importantly, by measuring the similarity at the reads level, we avoid the necessity of using large databases with annotated gene sequences. Hence our main finding is that environmental classification of metagenomic data can be proceeded without using large databases required for taxonomic or functional classification. REVIEWERS: This article was reviewed by Eran Elhaik, Alexandra Bettina Graf, Chengsheng Zhu, and Andre Kahles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.