Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31722719›Full record

ArticleEpigenetics & chromatin2019

The impact of genetic background and cell lineage on the level and pattern of gene expression in position effect variegation.

Sidney H Wang, Sarah C R Elgin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Epigenetics & chromatin, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Quantification of variegatedBiology methods & protocols · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Live analysis of position-effect variegation inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sidney H WangCenter for Human Genetics, The Brown Foundation Institute of Molecular Medicine, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA. hsi.ming.s.wang@uth.tmc.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-8459-1300
Sarah C R ElginDepartment of Biology, Washington University, St Louis, MO, 63130, USA. selgin@biology.wustl.edu.
Center for Human Genetics · USWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

Formation, Structure and Function in HeterochromatinR01GM068388 · NIGMS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI ELGIN, SARAH C.R. · 2003 to 2011
$3.9M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM068388NIH HHS GM068388
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChromatin-based transcriptional silencing is often described as a stochastic process, largely because of the mosaic expression observed in position effect variegation (PEV), where a euchromatic reporter gene is silenced in some cells as a consequence of juxtaposition with heterochromatin. High levels of variation in PEV phenotypes are commonly observed in reporter stocks. To ascertain whether background mutations are the major contributors to this variation, we asked how much of the variation is determined by genetic variants segregating in the population, examining both the level and pattern of expression using the fruit fly, Drosophila melanogaster, as the model.

resultsUsing selective breeding of a fourth chromosome PEV reporter line, 39C-12, we isolated two inbred lines exhibiting contrasting degrees of variegation (A1: low expression, D1: high expression). Within each inbred population, remarkable similarity is observed in the degree of variegation: 90% of the variation between the two inbred lines in the degree of silencing can be explained by genotype. Further analyses suggest that this result reflects the combined effect of multiple independent trans-acting loci. While the initial observations are based on a PEV phenotype scored in the fly eye (hsp70-white reporter), similar degrees of silencing were observed using a beta-gal reporter scored across the whole fly. Further, the pattern of variegation becomes almost identical within each inbred line; significant pigment enrichment in the same quadrant of the eye was found for both A1 and D1 lines despite different degrees of expression.

conclusionsThe results indicate that background genetic variants play the major role in determining the variable degrees of PEV commonly observed in laboratory stocks. Interestingly, not only does the degree of variegation become consistent in inbred lines, the patterns of variegation also appear similar. Combining these observations with the spreading model for local heterochromatin formation, we propose an augmented stochastic model to describe PEV in which the genetic background drives the overall level of silencing, working with the cell lineage-specific regulatory environment to determine the on/off probability at the reporter locus in each cell. This model acknowledges cell type-specific events in the context of broader genetic impacts on heterochromatin formation.

Indexed as

Chromosomal Position EffectsAnimalsCell LineageDrosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsEye ProteinsGene ExpressionGenes, ReporterGenetic BackgroundGenetic VariationHeterochromatinHSP70 Heat-Shock ProteinsModels, GeneticPhenotypePromoter Regions, GeneticDrosophila ProteinsEye ProteinsHeterochromatinHSP70 Heat-Shock ProteinsHeterochromatinModifiers of PEVPEVTranscription regulation

Identifiers

PMID31722719
PMCPMC6852933
OpenAlexW2986334069

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.