Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31722707›Full record

ArticleBMC medicine2019

Unravelling the complex nature of resilience factors and their changes between early and later adolescence.

J Fritz, J Stochl, E I Fried, I M Goodyer, C D van Borkulo, P O Wilkinson, A-L van Harmelen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Observational
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

J FritzDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. jf585@cam.ac.uk.
J StochlDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
E I FriedDepartment of Clinical Psychology, Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands.
I M GoodyerDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
C D van BorkuloDepartment of Psychological Methods, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
P O WilkinsonDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
A-L van HarmelenDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
University of Cambridge · GBLeiden University · NLUniversity of Amsterdam · NL

Funding

Medical Research CouncilMRF_ MRF-160-0007-ELP-VANHAWellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChildhood adversity (CA) is strongly associated with mental health problems. Resilience factors (RFs) reduce mental health problems following CA. Yet, knowledge on the nature of RFs is scarce. Therefore, we examined RF mean levels, RF interrelations, RF-distress pathways, and their changes between early (age 14) and later adolescence (age 17).

methodsWe studied 10 empirically supported RFs in adolescents with (CA+; n = 631) and without CA (CA-; n = 499), using network psychometrics.

resultsAll inter-personal RFs (e.g. friendships) showed stable mean levels between age 14 and 17, and three of seven intra-personal RFs (e.g. distress tolerance) changed in a similar manner in the two groups. The CA+ group had lower RFs and higher distress at both ages. Thus, CA does not seem to inhibit RF changes, but to increase the risk of persistently lower RFs. At age 14, but not 17, the RF network of the CA+ group was less positively connected, suggesting that RFs are less likely to enhance each other than in the CA- group. Those findings underpin the notion that CA has a predominantly strong proximal effect. RF-distress pathways did not differ in strength between the CA+ and the CA- group, which suggests that RFs have a similarly protective strength in the two groups. Yet, as RFs are lower and distress is higher, RF-distress pathways may overall be less advantageous in the CA+ group. Most RF interrelations and RF-distress pathways were stable between age 14 and 17, which may help explain why exposure to CA is frequently found to have a lasting impact on mental health.

conclusionsOur findings not only shed light on the nature and changes of RFs between early and later adolescence, but also offer some accounts for why exposure to CA has stronger proximal effects and is often found to have a lasting impact on mental health.

Indexed as

Adolescent DevelopmentResilience, PsychologicalAdolescentFemaleHumansMaleStress, PhysiologicalStress, PsychologicalAdolescenceChildhood adversityMental healthResilience factors

Identifiers

PMID31722707
PMCPMC6854636
OpenAlexW2956765411

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.