Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31722616›Full record

ReviewNeurorehabilitation and neural repair2019

Models of Traumatic Brain Injury in Aged Animals: A Clinical Perspective.

Aiwane Iboaya, Janna L Harris, Alexandra Nielsen Arickx, Randolph J Nudo

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neurorehabilitation and neural repair, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Experimental model for the study of traumatic brain injury.Romanian journal of morphology and embryology = Revue roumaine de morphologie et embryologie
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Aiwane IboayaUniversity of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA.
Janna L HarrisUniversity of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA.
Alexandra Nielsen ArickxUniversity of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA.
Randolph J NudoUniversity of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4674-0907
University of Kansas Medical Center · US

Funding

University of Kansas Alzheimer's Disease Research Center (KU ADRC)P30AG072973 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER · PI Jaime Perales Puchalt · 2021 to 2026
$25.3M
University of Kansas Alzheimer's Disease Core CentersP30AG035982 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER · PI BROOKS, WILLIAM M. · 2011 to 2020
$16.6M
REORGANIZATION OF MOTOR CORTEX FOLLOWING BRAIN INJURYR01NS030853 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI NUDO, RANDOLPH J. · 1993 to 2020
$6.5M
Bioenergetic dysfunction in the aging, injured brain: characterization and intervention with creatine.R21AG058052 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER · PI HARRIS, JANNA LEIGH · 2019 to 2020
$638k
Taurine Treatment for Traumatic Brain Injury in AgingR21NS091920 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER · PI HARRIS, JANNA LEIGH · 2015 to 2016
$415k
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG035982NIA NIH HHS P30 AG072973NIA NIH HHS R21 AG058052NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS030853NINDS NIH HHS R21 NS091920
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in the United States, with advanced age being one of the major predictors of poor prognosis. To replicate the mechanisms and multifaceted complexities of human TBI and develop prospective therapeutic treatments, various TBI animal models have been developed. These models have been essential in furthering our understanding of the pathophysiology and biochemical effects on brain mechanisms following TBI. Despite these advances, translating preclinical results to clinical application, particularly in elderly individuals, continues to be challenging. This review aims to provide a clinical perspective, identifying relevant variables currently not replicated in TBI animal models, to potentially improve translation to clinical practice, especially as it applies to elderly populations. As background for this clinical perspective, we reviewed articles indexed on PubMed from 1970 to 2019 that used aged animal models for studying TBI. These studies examined end points relevant for clinical translation, such as neurocognitive effects, sensorimotor behavior, physiological mechanisms, and efficacy of neuroprotective therapies. However, compared with the higher incidence of TBI in older individuals, animal studies on the basic science of aging and TBI remain remarkably scarce. Moreover, a fundamental disconnect remains between experiments in animal models of TBI and successful translation of findings for treating the older TBI population. In this article, we aim to provide a clinical perspective on the unique attributes of TBI in older individuals and a critical appraisal of the research to date on TBI in aged animal models as well as recommendations for future studies.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalAgingAnimalsBrainBrain Injuries, TraumaticCardiovascular DiseasesDiabetes ComplicationsHumansTranslational Research, Biomedicalaginganimal modelscomorbiditiestranslationtraumatic brain injury

Identifiers

PMID31722616
PMCPMC6920554
OpenAlexW2989067851

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.