Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31722605›Full record

ArticleMedical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making2020

Women's Acceptance of Overdetection in Breast Cancer Screening: Can We Assess Harm-Benefit Tradeoffs?

Anne Stiggelbout, Tessa Copp, Gemma Jacklyn, Jesse Jansen, Gerrit-Jan Liefers, Kirsten McCaffery, Jolyn Hersch

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Authors' response.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Anne StiggelboutMedical Decision Making, Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Zuid-Holland, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6293-4509
Tessa CoppWiser Healthcare, Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7801-5884
Gemma JacklynWiser Healthcare, Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Jesse JansenWiser Healthcare, Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Gerrit-Jan LiefersDepartment of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Zuid-Holland, the Netherlands.
Kirsten McCafferyWiser Healthcare, Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Jolyn HerschWiser Healthcare, Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

AgedAustraliaBreast NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansInternetMammographyMedical OveruseMiddle AgedNetherlandsPatient Acceptance of Health CareSurveys and Questionnairesattitudesbreast cancercancer screeningdecision makingearly detection of cancerinformed choiceoverdiagnosissurvey

Identifiers

PMID31722605
PMCPMC6985988

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.