Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31722438›Full record

ReviewBritish journal of pharmacology2020

The Second Gaddum Lecture: its origins and outcomes.

Y S Bakhle

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in British journal of pharmacology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. The Second Gaddum Lecture: its origins and outcomes.British journal of pharmacology · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Y S BakhleNHLI, Imperial College London, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fifty years ago, the BJP published the Second Gaddum Lecture, given by John Vane to the British Pharmacological Society. This article assesses the origins of the experiments described in the Lecture, linking them directly to Gaddum's use of bioassay, a defining feature of pharmacology. The outcomes of those experiments are also assessed, tracking those results that have survived the past five decades. Two of the major advances in cardiovascular medicine, the ACE inhibitors, as anti-hypertensives, and low-dose aspirin, to prevent thrombosis were initiated by the work in this Lecture. Physiologically significant outcomes include a new non-respiratory function of the lung, based on the metabolism of endogenous vasoactive substrates in the pulmonary circulation and the recognition of the endothelium as a highly interactive component of blood vessels. The present state of the art in pharmacology, physiology and medicine owes much to the work described in the Second Gaddum Lecture.

Indexed as

Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorsAspirinEndotheliumLungAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorsAspirin

Identifiers

PMID31722438
PMCPMC7042101

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.