Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31722288›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage. Clinical2019

Quantifying nerve decussation abnormalities in the optic chiasm.

Robert J Puzniak, Khazar Ahmadi, Jörn Kaufmann, Andre Gouws, Antony B Morland, Franco Pestilli, Michael B Hoffmann

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage. Clinical, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. [Neuro-computational approaches for objective assessment of visual function].Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft · 2021
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Robert J PuzniakDepartment of Ophthalmology, Otto-von-Guericke-University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.
Khazar AhmadiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Otto-von-Guericke-University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.
Jörn KaufmannDepartment of Neurology, Otto-von-Guericke-University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.
Andre GouwsYork Neuroimaging Centre, Department of Psychology, University of York, York, United Kingdom.
Antony B MorlandYork Neuroimaging Centre, Department of Psychology, University of York, York, United Kingdom; York Biomedical Research Institute, University of York, York, United Kingdom.
Franco PestilliDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Program in Neuroscience and Program in Cognitive Science, Indiana University, Bloomington, USA.
Michael B HoffmannDepartment of Ophthalmology, Otto-von-Guericke-University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany; Center for Behavioral Brain Sciences, Magdeburg, Germany. Electronic address: michael.hoffmann@med.ovgu.de.
Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg · DEUniversity of York · GBCenter for Behavioral Brain Sciences · DEIndiana University Bloomington · US

Funding

Medical Research Council G0401339
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe human optic chiasm comprises partially crossing optic nerve fibers. Here we used diffusion MRI (dMRI) for the in-vivo identification of the abnormally high proportion of crossing fibers found in the optic chiasm of people with albinism.

methodsIn 9 individuals with albinism and 8 controls high-resolution 3T dMRI data was acquired and analyzed with a set of methods for signal modeling [Diffusion Tensor (DT) and Constrained Spherical Deconvolution (CSD)], tractography, and streamline filtering (LiFE, COMMIT, and SIFT2). The number of crossing and non-crossing streamlines and their weights after filtering entered ROC-analyses to compare the discriminative power of the methods based on the area under the curve (AUC). The dMRI results were cross-validated with fMRI estimates of misrouting in a subset of 6 albinotic individuals.

resultsWe detected significant group differences in chiasmal crossing for both unfiltered DT (p = 0.014) and CSD tractograms (p = 0.0009) also reflected by AUC measures (for DT and CSD: 0.61 and 0.75, respectively), underlining the discriminative power of the approach. Estimates of crossing strengths obtained with dMRI and fMRI were significantly correlated for CSD (R

conclusionsEspecially CSD-based tractography provides an efficient approach to detect structural abnormalities in the optic chiasm. The most realistic results were obtained with filtering methods with parameters optimized for the data at hand. SIGNIFICANCE: Our findings demonstrate a novel anatomy-driven approach for the individualized diagnostics of optic chiasm abnormalities.

Indexed as

AdultAlbinismDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleNerve FibersOptic ChiasmVisual PathwaysAlbinismCrossing nervesDiffusion MRIFunctional MRIOptic chiasm

Identifiers

PMID31722288
PMCPMC6849426
OpenAlexW2986932418

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.