ReviewInternational ophthalmology2020
From international ophthalmology to space ophthalmology: the threats to vision on the way to Moon and Mars colonization.
Review in International ophthalmology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Ophthalmic and Visual System Changes in Human Spaceflight: A Review of Mechanisms, Measurement, and Countermeasures.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Review
- Article
- The Effects of Space Radiation and Microgravity on Ocular StructuresTurkish journal of ophthalmology · 2022Review
- Early Deconditioning of Human Skeletal Muscles and the Effects of a Thigh Cuff Countermeasure.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Article
- Radiation on Earth or in Space: What Does It Change?International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo report the ophthalmological risks of space travel.
methodsThe literature about the effect of microgravity and cosmic radiation on the human eye has been reviewed, focusing on the so-called "spaceflight related neuro-ocular syndrome (SANS)", and possible remedies.
resultsThe eye is the major candidate to suffer from the adverse space conditions, so much so that SANS is the main concern of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). SANS, that affects astronauts engaged in long-duration spaceflights, is characterized by optic nerve head swelling, flattening of the posterior region of the scleral shell, choroidal folds, retinal cotton wool spots, and hyperopic shift. Even if it seems related to an increased volume of the cerebrospinal fluid in the brain and the optic nerve sheaths, its pathogenesis is still unclear. In addition, cataract is related to the effect of galactic cosmic rays on the lens. Centrifuges, pressurizing chambers, and mechanical counter-pressure suits have been advanced to counteract the upward fluid shift responsible for the SANS syndrome. Shields with a high content of hydrogen, magnetic shielding systems, and wearable radiation shielding devices are under study to mitigate the exposure to galactic cosmic rays.
conclusionsSince 1961, the year of the first manned mission outside the Earth, history has shown that the human being may venture in space. Yet, visual impairment is the top health risk for long-duration spaceflight. Effective remediation is mandatory in anticipation of long space missions and Moon and Mars colonization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.