Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31722029›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2019

Trends in Self-perceived Weight Status, Weight Loss Attempts, and Weight Loss Strategies Among Adults in the United States, 1999-2016.

Liyuan Han, Dingyun You, Fangfang Zeng, Xiaoqi Feng, Thomas Astell-Burt, Shiwei Duan, Lu Qi

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT04737629 (Understanding the Effects of Herbs on Attention, Coordination, and Taste), which is not on this map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04737629 nawithdrawnnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Understanding the Effects of Herbs on Attention, Coordination, and Taste

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of FloridaRan2021 to 2023Enrolled0ConditionsAppetitive Behavior, Weight Loss, Water, Energy IntakeArmsExpectancy and Water, No Expectancy and Water, No Water
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Weight cycling and cancer risk in the Sister Study.American journal of epidemiology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Caloric Restriction, the Menstrual Cycle, and Sleep in Women Without Obesity.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Liyuan HanSchool of Medicine, Department of Epidemiology, Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Pathophysiology, Ningbo University, Ningbo, Zhejiang Province, China.
Dingyun YouSchool of Public Health, Kunming Medical University, Kunming City, Yunnan Province, China.
Fangfang ZengSchool of Medicine, Department of Epidemiology, Jinan University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China.
Xiaoqi FengPopulation Wellbeing and Environment Research Lab, School of Health and Society, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia.
Thomas Astell-BurtPopulation Wellbeing and Environment Research Lab, School of Health and Society, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia.
Shiwei DuanSchool of Medicine, Department of Epidemiology, Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Pathophysiology, Ningbo University, Ningbo, Zhejiang Province, China.
Lu QiSchool of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, Department of Epidemiology, Tulane University, New Orleans, Louisiana.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: The self-perception of weight and weight loss attempts might promote weight loss and maintenance. Objective: To examine trends in current measured body mass index (BMI) and weight, self-reported weight, self-perceived weight status, weight loss attempts, and weight loss strategies among adults in the United States. Design, Setting, and Participants: This national cross-sectional study used data from continuous National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) data sets (1999-2000 to 2015-2016). Participants were US residents older than 20 years. Data were analyzed from January 2018 to December 2018. Main Outcomes and Measures: Current measured BMI and weight, self-reported weight, self-perceived weight status, weight loss attempts, and applied weight loss strategies. Adjusted, self-reported, prior-year weight was calculated using correction equations that considered age, sex, race/ethnicity, and quartile of self-reported prior-year weight. Results: Data were collected from 48 026 participants (19 792 [41.2%] aged 40-64 years; 24 255 [50.5%] women; 21 725 [45.2%] white) through 9 surveys from 1999-2000 to 2015-2016. Increasing trends were observed in current measured BMI (difference, 1.20; 95% CI, 0.92-1.47; P for trend < .001), current measured weight (difference 2.77 kg; 95% CI, 1.92-3.61 kg; P for trend < .001), adjusted, self-reported, prior-year weight (difference, 2.36 kg; 95% CI, 1.52-3.21 kg; P for trend < .001), and the difference between measured and adjusted self-reported weight (difference 0.70 kg; 95% CI, 0.34-1.07 kg; P for trend < .001). During this period, the proportion of overall participants who had attempted to lose weight increased from 34.3% to 42.2% (difference, 8.0%; 95% CI, 4.1%-10.5%; P for trend < .001). The most commonly reported weight loss strategies with the most rapidly increasing prevalence during the study period were reduced food consumption (21.2%-31.9%; difference, 11.1%; 95% CI, 8.2%-13.3%; P for trend < .001), exercise (18.2%-31.5%; difference, 14.4%; 95% CI, 11.3%-16.9%; P for trend < .001), and frequent water intake (0.2%-26.3%; difference, 26.2%; 95% CI, 24.1%-29.0%; P for trend < .001). Between 2005-2006 and 2015-2016, increases were also observed for the reported consumption of more fruits, vegetables, and salads (0.1%-29.4%; difference, 30.3%; 95% CI, 28.1%-31.2%; P for trend < .001), changing eating habits (0.3%-20.5%; difference, 20.2%; 95% CI, 19.1%-22.3%; P for trend < .001), and the consumption of less sugar, candy, and sweets (0.2%-20.9%; difference, 21.7%; 95% CI, 19.3%-22.6%; P for trend < .001). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cross-sectional study, our data indicated an increasing trend in the proportion of participants who attempted to lose weight and a parallel increasing trend in current measured BMI and weight among adults in the United States.

Indexed as

Self ConceptWeight LossAdultBody ImageBody Mass IndexCross-Sectional StudiesDietFemaleHumansMiddle AgedNutrition SurveysOdds RatioSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited States

Identifiers

PMID31722029
PMCPMC6902793

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.