ArticleJAMA network open2019
Association of Physician Characteristics With Perceptions and Experiences of Gender Equity in an Academic Internal Medicine Department.
Article in JAMA network open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed.
- Physician respondents in sexual misconduct concerns in Canada: a comparative case analysis using publicly available information.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2026Article
- Is medical school culture conducive to women's academic success? a survey on faculty perceptions and experiences of gender equity.BMC medical education · 2024Article
- Workplace discrimination and harassment among Alberta postgraduate medical trainees: a cross-sectional survey.BMC medical education · 2024Article
- Alleviating stressfeeding in the emergency department: Elucidating the tensions induced by workplace lactation space issues.Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2024Article
- Gender-gap in randomized clinical trials reporting mortality in the perioperative setting and critical care: 20 years behind the scenes.Contemporary clinical trials communications · 2023Review
- Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion moments to raise Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion literacy among physician leaders.Canadian medical education journal · 2023Article
- Identifying Gender-Related Differences in Graduate Medical Education with the Use of a Web-Based Professionalism Monitoring Tool.Southern medical journal · 2023Article
- Experiences and Perceptions of Racism and Sexism Among Alberta Physicians: Quantitative Results and Framework Analysis of a Cross-Sectional Survey.Journal of general internal medicine · 2023Article
- Article
- Physicians' Experiences With Mistreatment and Discrimination by Patients, Families, and Visitors and Association With Burnout.JAMA network open · 2022Article
- Mistreatment Experiences, Protective Workplace Systems, and Occupational Distress in Physicians.JAMA network open · 2022Article
- Knowledge of Fertility and Perspectives About Family Planning Among Female Physicians.JAMA network open · 2022Article
- Identifying leadership in medical trainees: evaluation of a competency-based approach.BMJ leader · 2022Article
- Sex and gender in interstitial lung diseases.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2021Article
- Challenges to Navigating Pregnancy and Parenthood for Physician Parents: a Framework Analysis of Qualitative Data.Journal of general internal medicine · 2021Article
- Gender-based differences in physician payments within the fee-for-service system in Ontario: a retrospective, cross-sectional study.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2021Article
- Article
- Perceived inequity, professional and personal fulfillment by women intensivists in France.Annals of intensive care · 2021Article
- Gender Matters: Internal Medicine Resident Perceptions of Gender Bias in Medical Training.Journal of general internal medicine · 2021Article
- The Association Between Physician Gender and Career Advancement Among Academic Rheumatologists in the United States.Arthritis & rheumatology (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: The persistence of inequities that disadvantage women physicians remains empirically underexplained. Understanding the cultural factors that are associated with disparities in harassment, discrimination, remuneration, and career trajectory are critical to addressing inequities. Objectives: To explore how physicians perceive the climate for women physicians and compare perceptions and experiences of gender inequity among physicians based on characteristics including gender, faculty status, parental status, and years in practice. Design, Setting, and Participants: This sequential, explanatory, mixed-methods qualitative study used the Culture Conducive to Women's Academic Success (CCWAS; range 45-225, with higher scores indicating better perceived culture toward women), followed by individual semistructured interviews with physicians at the Department of Medicine of the University of Calgary. All 389 physician members of the Department of Medicine, including academic and clinical physicians and those of any gender, were invited to participate in the survey and interview phases. Main Outcomes and Measures: The culture within the department for women physicians was assessed using the CCWAS score. Scores were compared between respondents' gender and years in practice. Interviews with physicians were used to further explore findings from the CCWAS and to understand experiences and perceptions of gender disparities. Results: A total of 169 of 389 physicians completed the survey (response rate, 43.4%; 102 [59.9%] women; 65 [38.9%] men; and 2 [1.2%] who did not disclose gender); 28 participants (7.2%) elected to participate in an interview (22 [78.6%] women; 6 [21.4%] men). Women physicians perceived the culture of the department toward women as significantly worse than men physicians (median [interquartile range] CCWAS score, 137.0 [118.0-155.0] vs 164.5 [154.0-183.4]; P < .001). Physicians with more than 15 years in practice perceived the culture toward women as significantly more favorable than physicians with 15 years or less in practice (median [interquartile range] CCWAS score, 157.0 [138.8-181.3] vs 147.0 [127.5-164.3]; P = .02). Qualitative data demonstrated that experiences of junior women (ie, physicians who graduated medical school after 1996, when an equal number of men and women in medical school was achieved in Canada) and perceptions of senior men (ie, those who graduated before 1996) were most different; junior women reported high rates of discrimination and harassment, while senior men perceived that the Department of Medicine had achieved gender equity. Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, senior men physicians' perceptions of gender equity were different from lived experiences of gender inequity reported by junior women physicians. This demographic mismatch between perceptions and experiences of gender equity in medicine may explain the lack of action by leaders and decision-makers in medicine to mitigate disparities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.