ArticleJAMA network open2019
Association of Punitive and Reporting State Policies Related to Substance Use in Pregnancy With Rates of Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome.
Article in JAMA network open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 70 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
70 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 143 citations in OpenAlex.
- Punitive legal responses to prenatal drug use in the United States: A survey of state policies and systematic review of their public health impacts.The International journal on drug policy · 2024Pooled it
- Non-pharmacological care for opioid withdrawal in newborns.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020Pooled it
- Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine Special Statement: Guidance to reduce racial disparities in substance use screening and biological testing in pregnancy at the delivery admission.Pregnancy (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2026Article
- Mandated supporting, not reporting: Reimagining maternal health care for women who use drugs.Social science & medicine (1982) · 2026Article
- Discretionary Child Protective Services Reporting for Infants With Prenatal Opioid Exposure.Pediatrics · 2026Article
- Opening the Door Wider to Community Support of People With Serious Mental Illnesses: What States Can Learn From the IDD Experience.The Milbank quarterly · 2026Article
- Navigating pregnancy and addiction recovery: Patient perspectives on perinatal care interventions for women with opioid use disorder in Kentucky, USA.Addiction (Abingdon, England) · 2026Article
- Impact of policies on pregnant individuals using drugs: A narrative synthesis review of treatment, health care access, and outcomes.Stigma and health · 2026Article
- Perinatal substance use among United States veterans and servicemembers: A scoping review of the literature.Translational issues in psychological science · 2026Article
- Prenatal drug use criminalization and health system avoidance: Evidence from births in Alabama, South Carolina, and Tennessee, 1989-2019.Social science & medicine (1982) · 2025Article
- Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine Position Statement: Decriminalization of substance use disorder in pregnancy.Pregnancy (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2025Article
- Maternal health and incarceration: advancing pregnancy justice through research.Health & justice · 2025Article
- "Either way, they will use. And so, probably, would you:" A critical discourse analysis of harm reduction portrayal in United States opinion news media.The International journal on drug policy · 2025Article
- Content Analysis of Maternal Toxicology Testing Policies to Inform Equity in Substance Use Disorder Identification.Maternal and child health journal · 2025Article
- The Relationship Between Alcohol Availability and Drink-Driving Policies and Admissions to Substance Use Disorder Treatment During Pregnancy.Journal of studies on alcohol and drugs · 2025Article
- State Policy Variation in Implementation of Federal Drug and Child Abuse Laws and Stigmatization of Pregnant and Postpartum Individuals with Opioid Use Disorder.Journal of women's health (2002) · 2025Article
- Perinatal healthcare experiences of pregnant and parenting people with a history of substance use disorder: a qualitative study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2025Article
- Prenatal opioid exposure, neonatal abstinence syndrome diagnosis, and child welfare involvement.Child abuse & neglect · 2025Article
- Evaluating maternal drug use disparities, risk factors and outcomes in Northeast Arkansas: a pre, during, and post-COVID-19 pandemic analysis.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Severe Maternal Morbidity Among Pregnant People With Opioid Use Disorder Enrolled in Medicaid.JAMA network open · 2025Article
10 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Despite the rapidly changing policy environment regarding substance use during pregnancy, information is lacking on the association of state policies with neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS). Objective: To determine if punitive or reporting state policies related to substance use during pregnancy are associated with NAS rates. Design, Setting, and Participants: This repeated cross-sectional study used retrospective, difference-in-difference analysis of live births in the State Inpatient Databases from 8 US states in varying years between January 1, 2003, and December 31, 2014. States without punitive or reporting policies were compared with states with policies before and after policy enactment using logistic regression models adjusted for individual and county-level factors and state and year fixed effects. Analyses were conducted from April 10, 2019, to July 30, 2019. Exposures: Time since enactment of state policies related to substance use in pregnancy, county-level rurality and unemployment, and presence of specialized treatment programs for pregnant and postpartum women in a county. Main Outcome and Measures: Rates of NAS. Results: Among 4 567 963 live births, 23 377 neonates (0.5%) received a diagnosis of NAS. Among neonates with NAS, 3394 (14.5%) lived in counties without any treatment programs specifically for pregnant and postpartum women, 20 323 (86.9%) lived in metropolitan counties, and 8135 (34.8%) lived in counties in the highest unemployment quartile. In adjusted analyses among neonates in states with punitive policies, odds of NAS were significantly greater during the first full calendar year after enactment (adjusted odds ratio, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.06-1.46; P = .007) and more than 1 full year after enactment (adjusted odds ratio, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.17-1.51; P < .001). After regression adjustment, the annual NAS rate was 46 (95% CI, 43-48) neonates with NAS per 10 000 live births in states without punitive policies; 57 (95% CI, 48-65) neonates with NAS per 10 000 live births in states with punitive policies during the first full year after enactment; and 60 (95% CI, 56-65) neonates with NAS per 10 000 live births in states with punitive policies in effect for more than 1 full year. There was no association between reporting policies and odds of NAS. Conclusions and Relevance: In this repeated cross-sectional analysis of 8 states, states with punitive policies were associated with greater odds of NAS immediately and in the longer term, but there was no association between NAS and states with reporting policies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.