Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31722006›Full record

ArticleJournal of vision2019

Convergence and divergence to radial optic flow in infancy.

Elizabeth Nawrot, Mark Nawrot

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of vision, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 85% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Elizabeth NawrotDepartment of Psychology, Minnesota State University Moorhead, Moorhead, MN, USA.
Mark NawrotCenter for Visual and Cognitive Neuroscience, Department of Psychology, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND, USA.
Minnesota State University Moorhead · USNorth Dakota State University · US

Funding

Center for Visual and Cognitive NeuroscienceP20GM103505 · NIGMS · NORTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI MCCOURT, MARK E. · 2012 to 2014
$6.3M
The development of depth perception from motion parallax in human infantsR15HD058179 · NICHD · MINNESOTA STATE UNIVERSITY MOORHEAD · PI SHANNON NAWROT, ELIZABETH S. · 2009 to 2009
$216k
NICHD NIH HHS R15 HD058179NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103505
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Research finds a relationship between the development of depth perception and ocular motion functions including smooth pursuit and ocular following response. Infants' reactions to looming stimuli also suggest sensitivity to optic flow information that specifies relative distance. With radial optic flow, an expanding flow field elicits involuntary convergent eye movements while a contracting one elicits involuntary divergent eye movements. This response suggests the visual system is interpreting the radial flow as a change in relative depth. We measured the oculomotor response to radial optic flow in infants aged two to five months. The stimulus comprised a radial optic flow pattern that expanded or contracted across eight 400 ms trials while eye position was monitored with a Tobii X120 eye tracker. A subset of infants also viewed trials of a static version of the stimulus. On average, most infants in each age group demonstrated convergence to the expanding pattern and divergence to the contracting one. Moreover, the difference in gain between the convergence and divergence eye movements was significant. The presence of correct-direction vergence eye movements in response to expansion and contraction provides further evidence that infants are sensitive to information that specifies relative motion in depth.

Indexed as

Convergence, OcularDepth PerceptionEye MovementsFemaleHumansInfantMaleMotion PerceptionOptic FlowVision, Binocular

Identifiers

PMID31722006
PMCPMC6996593
OpenAlexW2983037134

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.