Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31721938›Full record

SynthesisClinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil)2019

Dementia screening in Brazil: a systematic review of normative data for the mini-mental state examination.

Gustavo Santiago-Bravo, Felipe Kenji Sudo, Naima Assunção, Claudia Drummond, Paulo Mattos

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Brand new norms for a good old test: Northern Italy normative study of MiniMental State Examination.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Gustavo Santiago-BravoMemory Clinic, Instituto D'Or de Pesquisa e Ensino, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, BR.ORCID 0000-0003-0001-363X
Felipe Kenji SudoMemory Clinic, Instituto D'Or de Pesquisa e Ensino, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, BR.ORCID 0000-0003-4738-1368
Naima AssunçãoMemory Clinic, Instituto D'Or de Pesquisa e Ensino, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, BR.ORCID 0000-0002-1262-8765
Claudia DrummondMemory Clinic, Instituto D'Or de Pesquisa e Ensino, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, BR.ORCID 0000-0002-6906-9335
Paulo MattosMemory Clinic, Instituto D'Or de Pesquisa e Ensino, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, BR.ORCID 0000-0003-0709-3783
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro · BRD’Or Institute for Research and Education · BRPontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) is the most widely used instrument for the screening of older adults with suspected cognitive impairment; the MMSE has been translated and validated in numerous languages and countries. The cultural and sociodemographic characteristics of the sample can influence performance on the test; therefore, applying the MMSE in different populations usually requires adjustments of those variables. From this perspective, the present study aims to review the normative data for the MMSE in the Brazilian older population, including those adaptations to the original test. Database searches were performed in Medline, Web of Knowledge, Scielo and Pepsic for articles assessing healthy elderly Brazilian samples using the MMSE. Heterogeneity across and within the studies was analyzed. Of a total of 1,085 retrieved articles, 14 were included. Significant differences across studies were identified for the characteristics of the samples, the presence of alterations to the MMSE subtests and the presentation of the results. The risk of biases was relevant for all the studies. Considering the large methodological heterogeneity among studies, the generalization of the available normative data for the MMSE may not be appropriate for the general elderly Brazilian population.

Indexed as

Mass ScreeningMental Status ScheduleNeuropsychological TestsAgedBrazilDementiaFemaleHumansMale

Identifiers

PMID31721938
PMCPMC6820509
OpenAlexW2983106752

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.