Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31721503›Full record

Trial reportHua xi kou qiang yi xue za zhi = Huaxi kouqiang yixue zazhi = West China journal of stomatology2019

[Comparing the effects of fast and slow expansion on nasal cavity and maxilla structure].

Jun-Ling Liu, Hong-Fa Li, Hui Yan

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Hua xi kou qiang yi xue za zhi = Huaxi kouqiang yixue zazhi = West China journal of stomatology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jun-Ling LiuTianjin Nankai Hospital, Tianjin 300000, China.
Hong-Fa LiStomatological Hospital, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin 300000, China.
Hui YanTianjin Nankai Hospital, Tianjin 300000, China.
Tianjin Nankai Hospital · CNTianjin Stomatological Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study aims to compare the effects of fast and slow expansion on nasal cavity structure.

methodsA total of 40 patients were selected and randomly divided into two groups. Cone-beam computer tomography (CBCT) was obtained before and after surgery and used for comparing the changes in nasal structure before and after treatment.

resultsFast expansion had resulted in greater changes in the basilar and nasal bone arch extension structures than slow expansion. No significant difference at maxillary width and nasal parenchyma.

conclusionsRapid expansion therapy has more beneficial effects on nasal function.

Indexed as

MaxillaPalatal Expansion TechniqueCephalometryCone-Beam Computed TomographyHumansNasal CavityNosecone-beam computer tomographyfast expansionnasal cavitynasal ventilationslow expansion

Identifiers

PMID31721503
PMCPMC7030404
OpenAlexW2995375936

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.