ArticleMemory & cognition2020
Psychometrics of the continuous mind: Measuring cognitive sub-processes via mouse tracking.
Article in Memory & cognition, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Using mouse cursor tracking to investigate online cognition: Preserving methodological ingenuity while moving toward reproducible science.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2021Pooled it
- Movement tracking of psychological processes: A tutorial using mousetrap.Behavior research methods · 2025Article
- Exploring the synthesis of mouse cursor tracking and drift diffusion modeling in a perceptual decision-making task.Behavior research methods · 2025Article
- Article
- Article
- To see or not to see: the parallel processing of self-relevance and facial expressions.Cognitive research: principles and implications · 2023Article
- Motor demands influence conflict processing in a mouse-tracking Simon task.Psychological research · 2023Article
- Deciding While Acting-Mid-Movement Decisions Are More Strongly Affected by Action Probability than Reward Amount.eNeuro · 2023Article
- Effects of conflict in cognitive control: Evidence from mouse tracking.Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006) · 2023Article
- Moving beyond response times with accessible measures of manual dynamics.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Costly avoidance of Pavlovian fear stimuli and the temporal dynamics of its decision process.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- The cone method: Inferring decision times from single-trial 3D movement trajectories in choice behavior.Behavior research methods · 2021Article
- Adjustments of selective attention to response conflict - controlling for perceptual conflict, target-distractor identity, and congruency level sequence pertaining to the congruency sequence effect.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2021Article
- The Specificity and Reliability of Conflict Adaptation: A Mouse-Tracking Study.Frontiers in psychology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The measurement of psychological properties often relies on discrete measures, for example, answers in questionnaires or responses in tasks. This focus on discrete measures neglects information that is present in the process leading to an answer or a response. A method to trace such processes is mouse tracking. Mouse tracking promises to open a continuous window onto the processes leading from a stimulus to a response. However, most mouse-tracking studies fall short of the promise to extract dynamic psychometrically valid markers for the different sub-processes, which are intertwined on the way to the final response. Here we used time-continuous multiple regression (TCMR) to extract dynamic markers for the different sub-processes leading to a response. From these markers, we extracted information about the timing, the duration, and the strength of the influence of the different sub-processes. We evaluated these dynamic measures of sub-processes for their psychometric properties, i.e. reliability, which is a basis for their use in the study of individual differences. Furthermore, we applied these dynamic measures in a group-level study to identify differences in the sub-processes of resolving response conflict between groups performing either a Simon or a flanker task. We found specific temporal patterns that match predictions from a conceptual model of these tasks. We concluded that the extracted information from mouse movements could be used as psychometrically valid dynamic measures of psychological properties and their differences across individuals and situations.A software toolbox to perform the described analyses in Matlab is provided (osf.io/5e3vn).
Indexed as
Identifiers
31721062What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.