Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31720967›Full record

ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2020

Too Many Don'ts and Not Enough Do's? A Survey of Hospitals About Their Portal Instructions for Patients.

Joy L Lee, Claire E Williams, Sean Baird, Marianne S Matthias, Michael Weiner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Digital Engagement: How Serious Are Hospitals?Journal of general internal medicine · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Joy L LeeDivision of General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, 1101 W. 10th St., Indianapolis, IN, 46151, USA. joyllee@iu.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-2589-8200
Claire E WilliamsRegenstrief Institute, Inc., Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Sean BairdRegenstrief Institute, Inc., Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Marianne S MatthiasDivision of General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, 1101 W. 10th St., Indianapolis, IN, 46151, USA.
Michael WeinerDivision of General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, 1101 W. 10th St., Indianapolis, IN, 46151, USA.

Funding

Quality Assurance and Quality Control Project Management: Improving Submissions and Study Conduct in the Human Subjects Research Prior Approval ProcessUL1TR002529 · NCATS · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI MOE, SHARON M, WIEHE, SARAH ELIZABETH · 2018 to 2022
$27.2M
Indiana Clinical and Translational Sciences InstituteUL1TR001108 · NCATS · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI DENNE, SCOTT C., SHEKHAR, ANANTHA · 2013 to 2017
$23.3M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001108NCATS NIH HHS UL1TR001108NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002529NCATS NIH HHS UL1TR002529
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatient portals present the opportunity to expand patients' access to their clinicians and health information. Yet patients and clinicians have expressed the need for more guidance on portal and secure messaging procedures to avoid misuse. Little information is currently available concerning whether and how expectations of portal and messaging usage are communicated to patients.

objectiveTo identify the information made available to patients about patient portal use, and to assess ease in accessing such information.

designA national survey of publicly available portal information from hospital websites. The study team followed up with phone calls to each hospital to request any additional patient-directed materials (e.g., pamphlets) not located in the web search.

participantsA random sample of 200 acute-care hospitals, 50 from each of four US Census regions, selected from the US Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Hospital Compare dataset. MAIN MEASURES: Availability of patient portals, secure messaging, and related functionality; the content and ease of access to patient-directed information about portals. KEY

resultsOf the hospitals sampled, 177 (89%) had a patient portal; 116 (66%) of these included secure messaging functionality. Most portals with secure messaging (N = 65, 58%) did not describe appropriate patient messaging conduct. Although many included disclaimers that the service is not for emergencies, 23 hospitals only included this within the fine prints of their "Terms and Conditions" section. Content analysis of additional patient-directed materials revealed a focus on logistical content, features of the portals, and parameters of use. Of the three categories, logistical content (e.g., creating an account) was the most thorough.

conclusionsAlthough most of the sampled hospitals had patient portals, many fail to educate patients fully and set expectations for secure messaging. To improve patient engagement and minimize harm, hospitals and clinicians need to provide more information and set clearer guidelines for patients.

Indexed as

CommunicationPatient PortalsAgedElectronic Health RecordsHospitalsHumansMedicarePatient ParticipationUnited Stateselectronic health recordinformaticspatient portalspatient provider communication

Identifiers

PMID31720967
PMCPMC7174450

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.