Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31720889›Full record

Trial reportDigestive diseases and sciences2020

A Randomized Control Trial of Thromboelastography-Guided Transfusion in Cirrhosis for High-Risk Invasive Liver-Related Procedures.

Sudheer K Vuyyuru, Achintya D Singh, Shivanand R Gamanagatti, Gyanranjan Rout, Deepak Gunjan, Shalimar

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Digestive diseases and sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 84 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Effect of Nutritional Status on Coagulation and Inflammation in Patients With Cirrhosis and Variceal Bleeding.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Sudheer K VuyyuruDepartment of Gastroenterology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Achintya D SinghDepartment of Internal Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Shivanand R GamanagattiDepartment of Radiodiagnosis, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Gyanranjan RoutDepartment of Gastroenterology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Deepak GunjanDepartment of Gastroenterology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
ShalimarDepartment of Gastroenterology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India. drshalimar@yahoo.com.ORCID 0000-0003-1247-437X
All India Institute of Medical Sciences · INCleveland Clinic · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimHemostasis in cirrhosis is dynamic and balanced. Thromboelastography (TEG) assesses global coagulation status. We aimed to assess whether TEG-guided blood product transfusions result in lower blood product requirements in patients with cirrhosis undergoing invasive liver-related procedures as compared to the conventional standard of care (SOC).

methodsIn this open-label, randomized controlled trial, cirrhosis patients with coagulopathy, undergoing invasive liver-related procedures, were randomized to either TEG-guided blood product transfusion or SOC. The primary outcome was difference in the amount of fresh frozen plasma (FFP) and platelet units transfused between the two groups. The secondary outcome was procedure-related bleeding complications within 5 days and any complications until 28 days.

resultsFrom November 2017 till June 2019, 58 patients were recruited (29: TEG and 29: SOC). Most common procedures performed were percutaneous liver biopsy (n = 48), followed by transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (n = 2), percutaneous acetic acid injection (n = 2), and transarterial chemoembolization (n = 2). There were no differences in baseline demographics, hemostatic profile, and types of procedures between the two groups. Only nine patients in TEG group received transfusions compared to all patients in SOC (31% vs 100%; P < 0.001). In TEG group, six (20.7%) received FFP (P = 0.753 vs. SOC), two (6.9%) received platelets (P < 0.001 vs. SOC), and 1(3.4%) patient received both FFP and platelet (P ≥ 0.999 vs. SOC) transfusion. None of the patients in either group developed procedure-related bleeding complications until 5 days post-procedure. The complication rates at 28-day follow-up were similar between the groups.

conclusionTEG-guided blood product transfusion strategy reduces blood product transfusion without increased risk of bleeding in cirrhotic patients undergoing invasive liver-related procedures (CTRI/2017/12/010822).

Indexed as

ThrombelastographyAcetic AcidAdultBiopsyBlood Coagulation DisordersBlood Component TransfusionChemoembolization, TherapeuticFemaleHumansImage-Guided BiopsyInjectionsInternational Normalized RatioLiver CirrhosisMaleMiddle AgedPatient SelectionAcetic AcidCoagulopathyCTPInterventionLiver biopsyMELD

Identifiers

PMID31720889
OpenAlexW2987948403

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.