Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31720851›Full record

ReviewClinical oral investigations2020

Laser therapy for recurrent aphthous stomatitis: an overview.

Juliana Amorim Dos Santos, Ana Gabriela Costa Normando, Isabela Porto de Toledo, Gilberto Melo, Graziela De Luca Canto, Alan Roger Santos-Silva, Eliete Neves Silva Guerra

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical oral investigations, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Journal of lasers in medical sciences · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Juliana Amorim Dos SantosLaboratory of Oral Histopathology, Health Sciences Faculty, University of Brasilia, Asa Norte, Brasilia, DF, 70910-900, Brazil.
Ana Gabriela Costa NormandoLaboratory of Oral Histopathology, Health Sciences Faculty, University of Brasilia, Asa Norte, Brasilia, DF, 70910-900, Brazil.
Isabela Porto de ToledoLaboratory of Oral Histopathology, Health Sciences Faculty, University of Brasilia, Asa Norte, Brasilia, DF, 70910-900, Brazil.
Gilberto MeloBrazilian Centre for Evidence-Based Research, Department of Dentistry, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Brazil.
Graziela De Luca CantoBrazilian Centre for Evidence-Based Research, Department of Dentistry, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Brazil.
Alan Roger Santos-SilvaOral Diagnosis, Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas (UNICAMP), São Paulo, Brazil.
Eliete Neves Silva GuerraLaboratory of Oral Histopathology, Health Sciences Faculty, University of Brasilia, Asa Norte, Brasilia, DF, 70910-900, Brazil. elieteneves.unb@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7622-1550
Universidade de Brasília · BRUniversidade Federal de Santa Catarina · BRUniversidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo evaluate therapeutic effects of laser therapy on patients with recurrent aphthous stomatitis assessing evidences from previously published systematic reviews. MATERIALS AND

methodsAn overview of systematic reviews was conducted based on PRISMA checklist. Search strategies were developed and adapted for six different electronic databases and a gray literature search was also performed. The methodology quality of the included systematic reviews was assessed by the Measurement Tool to Assess the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews 2 (AMSTAR 2).

resultsAfter a two-step selection, five systematic reviews were included. Methodology quality was considered as a high risk of bias in two systematic reviews, while in the other three were graded as moderate. The systematic reviews' conclusions demonstrated that all included systematics reviews showed positive effects of laser therapy for pain relief, and most of them demonstrated healing improvement. A meta-analysis was not feasible due to heterogeneity in treatments parameters.

conclusionsEvidence suggested that laser therapy is an effective tool to treat recurrent aphthous stomatitis; nevertheless, more randomized clinical trials should be conducted to compare different lasers parameters. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The present overview evaluated recent evidence about laser therapy for recurrent aphthous stomatitis management in order to contribute for evidence-based dentistry and decision-making. This overview suggests that laser therapy is a safe and promising alternative to treat recurrent aphthous stomatitis, since it promotes wound healing and pain relief.

Indexed as

Lasers, GasLaser TherapyLow-Level Light TherapyStomatitis, AphthousHumansPainEvidence-based medicineLasersOral medicineOral ulcerOverviewSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID31720851
OpenAlexW2988223969

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.