Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31720840›Full record

ReviewMikrochimica acta2019

A review on recent advancements in electrochemical biosensing using carbonaceous nanomaterials.

Alireza Sanati, Mahsa Jalali, Keyvan Raeissi, Fathallah Karimzadeh, Mahshid Kharaziha, Sahar Sadat Mahshid, Sara Mahshid

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Mikrochimica acta, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed
7.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 147 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Recent developments in waterborne pathogen detection technologies.Environmental monitoring and assessment · 2025
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Alireza SanatiDepartment of Materials Engineering, Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan, 84156-83111, Iran.
Mahsa JalaliDepartment of Bioengineering, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, H3A 0E9, Canada.
Keyvan RaeissiDepartment of Materials Engineering, Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan, 84156-83111, Iran.
Fathallah KarimzadehDepartment of Materials Engineering, Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan, 84156-83111, Iran.
Mahshid KharazihaDepartment of Materials Engineering, Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan, 84156-83111, Iran.
Sahar Sadat MahshidSunnybrook Research Institute, Sunnybrook Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, M4N 3M5, Canada. sahar.mahshid@utoronto.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-0834-8787
Sara MahshidDepartment of Bioengineering, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, H3A 0E9, Canada. sara.mahshid@mcgill.ca.ORCID 0000-0003-4203-819X
Isfahan University of Technology · IRSunnybrook Hospital · CAMcGill University · CA

Funding

Canada Foundation for Innovation G248924Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada G247765Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada G248584
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review, with 201 references, describes the recent advancement in the application of carbonaceous nanomaterials as highly conductive platforms in electrochemical biosensing. The electrochemical biosensing is described in introduction by classifying biosensors into catalytic-based and affinity-based biosensors and statistically demonstrates the most recent published works in each category. The introduction is followed by sections on electrochemical biosensors configurations and common carbonaceous nanomaterials applied in electrochemical biosensing, including graphene and its derivatives, carbon nanotubes, mesoporous carbon, carbon nanofibers and carbon nanospheres. In the following sections, carbonaceous catalytic-based and affinity-based biosensors are discussed in detail. In the category of catalytic-based biosensors, a comparison between enzymatic biosensors and non-enzymatic electrochemical sensors is carried out. Regarding the affinity-based biosensors, scholarly articles related to biological elements such as antibodies, deoxyribonucleic acids (DNAs) and aptamers are discussed in separate sections. The last section discusses recent advancements in carbonaceous screen-printed electrodes as a growing field in electrochemical biosensing. Tables are presented that give an overview on the diversity of analytes, type of materials and the sensors performance. Ultimately, general considerations, challenges and future perspectives in this field of science are discussed. Recent findings suggest that interests towards 2D nanostructured electrodes based on graphene and its derivatives are still growing in the field of electrochemical biosensing. That is because of their exceptional electrical conductivity, active surface area and more convenient production methods compared to carbon nanotubes. Graphical abstract Schematic representation of carbonaceous nanomaterials used in electrochemical biosensing. The content is classified into non-enzymatic sensors and affinity/ catalytic biosensors. Recent publications are tabulated and compared, considering materials, target, limit of detection and linear range of detection.

Indexed as

Biosensing TechniquesElectrochemical TechniquesAntibodiesAptamers, NucleotideDNANanotubes, CarbonParticle SizeSurface PropertiesAntibodiesAptamers, NucleotideDNANanotubes, CarbonAptasensorsCarbon nanotubesCatalytic biosensorsDNA based biosensorsElectrochemical biosensorsEnzymesGrapheneImmunosensors

Identifiers

PMID31720840
OpenAlexW2984027101

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.