Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31720837›Full record

ArticleGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2020

Recovery dynamics of multifocal pupillographic objective perimetry from tropicamide dilation.

Bhim Bahadur Rai, Faran Sabeti, Corinne F Carle, Emilie M F Rohan, Özge Saraç, Joshua van Kleef, Ted Maddess

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Bhim Bahadur RaiDivision of Neuroscience, John Curtin School of Medical Research, Australian National University, Building 131 Garran Road, Canberra, ACT, 2601, Australia. bhim.rai@anu.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0748-4581
Faran SabetiDivision of Neuroscience, John Curtin School of Medical Research, Australian National University, Building 131 Garran Road, Canberra, ACT, 2601, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9187-7569
Corinne F CarleDivision of Neuroscience, John Curtin School of Medical Research, Australian National University, Building 131 Garran Road, Canberra, ACT, 2601, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3309-9073
Emilie M F RohanDivision of Neuroscience, John Curtin School of Medical Research, Australian National University, Building 131 Garran Road, Canberra, ACT, 2601, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0402-3296
Özge SaraçDivision of Neuroscience, John Curtin School of Medical Research, Australian National University, Building 131 Garran Road, Canberra, ACT, 2601, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3459-8058
Joshua van KleefDivision of Neuroscience, John Curtin School of Medical Research, Australian National University, Building 131 Garran Road, Canberra, ACT, 2601, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2167-0348
Ted MaddessDivision of Neuroscience, John Curtin School of Medical Research, Australian National University, Building 131 Garran Road, Canberra, ACT, 2601, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4591-3658
Australian National University · AU

Funding

Australian Research Council through ARC Centre of Excellence in Vision Science CE0561903
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo study the pupillary system by combining mydriasis and multifocal pupillographic objective perimetry (mfPOP). In particular, we explored how the dynamics of recovery differ for concurrently measured direct and consensual sensitivity, response delay, and signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) for binocular mydriasis.

methodsWe recruited 26 normal participants, all with brown irides. The dichoptic mfPOP stimuli concurrently assessed 44-region/eye and both pupils. Two pre-dilation tests were followed by pairs of repeated tests at 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, and 48 h following dilation of both pupils with 1% tropicamide. Three subjects were retested with only the right pupil dilated. Linear models determined the independent effects of mydriasis upon the per-region and pupil measures over time.

resultsPost-dilation, the per-region delays initially decreased by 16.3 ± 6.02 ms (mean ± SE) (p < 0.0001, cf. baseline of 471.1 ± 4.36 ms), then increased to slower than baseline by 17.42 ± 5.57 ms after 4 h (p < 0.002), recovering to baseline at 8 h. By comparison, per-region sensitivities (constriction amplitudes) were still reduced by - 6.20 ± 0.70 μm at 8 h (p < 0.0001, cf. baseline of 21.1 ± 0.55 μm), recovered at 24 h, but rebounded at 48 h (p = 0.005). The SNRs for sensitivities and delays both recovered by 8-12 h. Across all the data, sensitivities reduced by 2.67 ± 0.25 μm/decade of age, and delay increased by 15.4 ± 1.98 ms/decade (both p < 0.00001). Data from 3 of the 26 subjects who repeated the testing for monocular dilation found that consensual response sensitivities were larger than direct for 8 h (p < 0.018).

conclusionsThe per-region sensitivities were affected for longer than SNRs or delays. Strong early SNRs indicated proportionately lower pupil noise for larger pupil diameters. Following mydriasis with tropicamide 1%, the constriction amplitude measurements with mfPOP should be considered only after 48 h, but time-to-peak can be measured after 8-12 h.

Indexed as

AdultDiagnostic Techniques, OphthalmologicalEye ColorFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHealthy VolunteersHumansMaleMiddle AgedMydriaticsPupilTropicamideVisual FieldsVisual Field TestsYoung AdultMydriaticsTropicamideAnisocoriaMultifocalObjective perimetryPupillographyRebound miosisTropicamide

Identifiers

PMID31720837
OpenAlexW2987792824

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.