Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31720809›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2020

Clinical and economic burden of colorectal and bariatric anastomotic leaks.

Sang W Lee, David Gregory, Christina L Cool

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Use of Human Amnion/Chorion Membrane as a Protective Barrier in Complicated Diverticulitis Patients Undergoing Colorectal Resections.European surgical research. Europaische chirurgische Forschung. Recherches chirurgicales europeennes · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Maximizing Readmission Reduction in Colon Cancer Patients.The Journal of surgical research · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Real-time First-In-Human Comparison of Laser Speckle Contrast Imaging and ICG in Minimally Invasive Colorectal & Bariatric Surgery.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sang W LeeDivision of Colorectal Surgery and Clinical Surgery, Keck Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, USA.
David GregoryHealthcare Consulting, Baker Tilly Virchow Krause, LLP, New York, USA. David.Gregory@bakertilly.com.
Christina L CoolHealthcare Consulting, Baker Tilly Virchow Krause, LLP, New York, USA.
Keck Hospital of USC · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAnastomotic leaks cause a significant clinical and economic burden on patients undergoing bariatric and colorectal surgeries. Current literature shows a wide variation in incidence of anastomotic leaks and a significant gap in associated economic metrics. This analysis utilized claims data to quantify the full episode-of-care cost burden of leaks following colorectal and bariatric surgeries.

methodsMedicare Fee-for-Service and commercial claims data from a large U.S.-based health plan were queried for cost and utilization of members that underwent bariatric and colorectal surgical procedures between January 1, 2013 and August 31, 2015. Outcomes were collected for members with anastomotic leaks versus those without leaks during the initial hospital stay (index) and within 30 days of the procedure. These outcomes included leak frequency, payer reimbursement, and length of stay (LOS).

resultsThe colorectal Medicare analysis identified 239,350 patients undergoing colorectal surgery. For patients with a leak compared to those without, index admission costs were $30,670 greater ($48,982 vs. $18,312; p < 0.0001) and the index LOS was 12 days longer (19 vs. 7 days; p < 0.0001). This finding was similar for the bariatric patients (n = 62,292) where cost was $30,885 higher ($43,918 vs. $13,033; p < 0.0001) and LOS was 15 days longer (17 vs. 2 days; p < 0.0001). Furthermore, readmissions and associated costs were also substantially higher for those with an index leak. The commercial analysis of both the bariatric and colorectal populations trended similarly to the Medicare population in regards to all outcomes measured.

conclusionPatients experiencing anastomotic leaks during and after bariatric and colorectal surgery have significantly higher costs and longer LOS both at the initial stay and within 30 days of the procedure. It is important that providers and hospitals understand the economic consequences of these procedures and implement technologies and techniques to prevent/reduce anastomotic leaks.

Indexed as

Cost of IllnessAdultAgedAnastomotic LeakBariatric SurgeryColorectal SurgeryFemaleHumansInpatientsLength of StayMaleMedicareMiddle AgedPatient ReadmissionRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsAnastomotic leaksCost analysisIntraoperative endoscopy

Identifiers

PMID31720809
OpenAlexW2988131431

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.