Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31720789›Full record

ReviewPsychological research2021

Human appetitive Pavlovian-to-instrumental transfer: a goal-directed account.

Justin Mahlberg, Tina Seabrooke, Gabrielle Weidemann, Lee Hogarth, Chris J Mitchell, Ahmed A Moustafa

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Psychological research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Motivational control of habits: A preregistered fMRI study.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Justin MahlbergSchool of Social Sciences and Psychology, Western Sydney University, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith, Sydney, NSW, 2751, Australia. j.mahlberg@westernsydney.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3974-2362
Tina SeabrookeSchool of Psychology, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Gabrielle WeidemannSchool of Social Sciences and Psychology, Western Sydney University, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith, Sydney, NSW, 2751, Australia.
Lee HogarthSchool of Psychology, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
Chris J MitchellSchool of Psychology, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK.
Ahmed A MoustafaSchool of Social Sciences and Psychology, Western Sydney University, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith, Sydney, NSW, 2751, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pavlovian-to-instrumental transfer (PIT) tasks assess the impact of environmental stimuli on instrumental actions. Since their initial translation from animal to human experiments, PIT tasks have provided insight into the mechanisms that underlie reward-based behaviour. This review first examines the main types of PIT tasks used in humans. We then seek to contribute to the current debate as to whether human PIT effects reflect a controlled, goal-directed process, or a more automatic, non-goal-directed mechanism. We argue that the data favour a goal-directed process. The extent to which the major theories of PIT can account for these data is then explored. We discuss a number of associative accounts of PIT as well as dual-process versions of these theories. Ultimately, however, we favour a propositional account, in which human PIT effects are suggested to be driven by both perceived outcome availability and outcome value. In the final section of the review, we present the potential objections to the propositional approach that we anticipate from advocates of associative link theories and our response to them. We also identify areas for future research.

Indexed as

RewardAnimalsConditioning, ClassicalConditioning, OperantGoalsHumansMaleReinforcement, PsychologyTransfer, Psychology

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.