Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31720740›Full record

ReviewCellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS2020

Diversity of macrophage phenotypes and responses in atherosclerosis.

Hiroyuki Jinnouchi, Liang Guo, Atsushi Sakamoto, Sho Torii, Yu Sato, Anne Cornelissen, Salome Kuntz, Ka Hyun Paek, Raquel Fernandez, Daniela Fuller and 6 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 119 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
119citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

119 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Kupffer cells: Orchestrators of liver physiology.Liver research (Beijing, China) · 2026
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Cytotoxic CD4Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2026
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Iron in Vascular Calcification: Pro-Calcific Agent or Protective Modulator?International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  20. Article

59 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Hiroyuki JinnouchiCVPath Institute, 19 Firstfield Road, Gaithersburg, MD, 20878, USA.
Liang GuoCVPath Institute, 19 Firstfield Road, Gaithersburg, MD, 20878, USA.
Atsushi SakamotoCVPath Institute, 19 Firstfield Road, Gaithersburg, MD, 20878, USA.
Sho ToriiCVPath Institute, 19 Firstfield Road, Gaithersburg, MD, 20878, USA.
Yu SatoCVPath Institute, 19 Firstfield Road, Gaithersburg, MD, 20878, USA.
Anne CornelissenCVPath Institute, 19 Firstfield Road, Gaithersburg, MD, 20878, USA.
Salome KuntzCVPath Institute, 19 Firstfield Road, Gaithersburg, MD, 20878, USA.
Ka Hyun PaekCVPath Institute, 19 Firstfield Road, Gaithersburg, MD, 20878, USA.
Raquel FernandezCVPath Institute, 19 Firstfield Road, Gaithersburg, MD, 20878, USA.
Daniela FullerCVPath Institute, 19 Firstfield Road, Gaithersburg, MD, 20878, USA.
Neel GadhokeCVPath Institute, 19 Firstfield Road, Gaithersburg, MD, 20878, USA.
Dipti SurveCVPath Institute, 19 Firstfield Road, Gaithersburg, MD, 20878, USA.
Maria RomeroCVPath Institute, 19 Firstfield Road, Gaithersburg, MD, 20878, USA.
Frank D KolodgieCVPath Institute, 19 Firstfield Road, Gaithersburg, MD, 20878, USA.
Renu VirmaniCVPath Institute, 19 Firstfield Road, Gaithersburg, MD, 20878, USA.
Aloke V FinnCVPath Institute, 19 Firstfield Road, Gaithersburg, MD, 20878, USA. afinn@cvpath.org.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The presence of macrophages within the plaque is a defining hallmark of atherosclerosis. Macrophages are exposed to various microenvironments such as oxidized lipids and cytokines which effect their phenotypic differentiation and activation. Classically, macrophages have been divided into two groups: M1 and M2 macrophages induced by T-helper 1 and T-helper 2 cytokines, respectively. However, for a decade, greater phenotypic heterogeneity and plasticity of these cells have since been reported in various models. In addition to M1 and M2 macrophage phenotypes, the concept of additional macrophage phenotypes such as M (Hb), Mox, and M4 has emerged. Understanding the mechanisms and functions of distinct phenotype of macrophages can lead to determination of their potential role in atherosclerotic plaque pathogenesis. However, there are still many unresolved controversies regarding their phenotype and function with respect to atherosclerosis. Here, we summarize and focus on the differential subtypes of macrophages in atherosclerotic plaques and their differing functional roles based upon microenvironments such as lipid, intraplaque hemorrhage, and plaque regression.

Indexed as

AtherosclerosisCell DifferentiationCell LineageCellular MicroenvironmentCytokinesHumansLipid MetabolismMacrophage ActivationMacrophagesPhenotypePlaque, AtheroscleroticCytokinesHemorrhageLipidMacrophagePhenotype

Identifiers

PMID31720740
PMCPMC11104939

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.