Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31720728›Full record

ArticleDiabetologia2020

An artificial intelligence-based deep learning algorithm for the diagnosis of diabetic neuropathy using corneal confocal microscopy: a development and validation study.

Bryan M Williams, Davide Borroni, Rongjun Liu, Yitian Zhao, Jiong Zhang, Jonathan Lim, Baikai Ma, Vito Romano, Hong Qi, Maryam Ferdousi and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diabetologia, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 78 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
78citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

78 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Artificial Intelligence in Diabetes Care: Applications, Challenges, and Opportunities Ahead.Endocrine practice : official journal of the American College of Endocrinology and the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Artificial Intelligence to Diagnose Complications of Diabetes.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2025
    Review
  20. Review

18 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Bryan M WilliamsDepartment of Eye and Vision Science, University of Liverpool, William Henry Duncan Building, 6 West Derby Street, Liverpool, L7 8TX, UK.
Davide BorroniSt Paul's Eye Unit, Royal Liverpool University Hospital, Liverpool, UK.
Rongjun LiuDepartment of Ophthalmology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Yitian ZhaoSt Paul's Eye Unit, Royal Liverpool University Hospital, Liverpool, UK.
Jiong ZhangLaboratory of Neuro Imaging, Institute for Neuroimaging and Informatics, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Jonathan LimDepartment of Endocrinology and Diabetes, University Hospital Aintree, Longmoor Lane, Liverpool, UK.
Baikai MaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Vito RomanoDepartment of Eye and Vision Science, University of Liverpool, William Henry Duncan Building, 6 West Derby Street, Liverpool, L7 8TX, UK.
Hong QiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Maryam FerdousiDepartment of Endocrinology and Diabetes, University Hospital Aintree, Longmoor Lane, Liverpool, UK.
Ioannis N PetropoulosWeill Cornell Medicine - Qatar, Doha, Qatar.
Georgios PonirakisWeill Cornell Medicine - Qatar, Doha, Qatar.
Stephen KayeDepartment of Eye and Vision Science, University of Liverpool, William Henry Duncan Building, 6 West Derby Street, Liverpool, L7 8TX, UK.
Rayaz A MalikWeill Cornell Medicine - Qatar, Doha, Qatar.
Uazman AlamDiabetes and Neuropathy Research, Department of Eye and Vision Sciences and Pain Research Institute, Institute of Ageing and Chronic Disease, University of Liverpool and Aintree University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, William Henry Duncan Building, 6 West Derby Street, Liverpool, L7 8TX, UK. uazman.alam@liverpool.ac.uk.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3190-1122
Yalin ZhengDepartment of Eye and Vision Science, University of Liverpool, William Henry Duncan Building, 6 West Derby Street, Liverpool, L7 8TX, UK. yalin.zheng@liverpool.ac.uk.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7873-0922

Funding

Department of Health II-LA-0813-20005Department of Health II-LA-1116-20008
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aims/hypothesisCorneal confocal microscopy is a rapid non-invasive ophthalmic imaging technique that identifies peripheral and central neurodegenerative disease. Quantification of corneal sub-basal nerve plexus morphology, however, requires either time-consuming manual annotation or a less-sensitive automated image analysis approach. We aimed to develop and validate an artificial intelligence-based, deep learning algorithm for the quantification of nerve fibre properties relevant to the diagnosis of diabetic neuropathy and to compare it with a validated automated analysis program, ACCMetrics.

methodsOur deep learning algorithm, which employs a convolutional neural network with data augmentation, was developed for the automated quantification of the corneal sub-basal nerve plexus for the diagnosis of diabetic neuropathy. The algorithm was trained using a high-end graphics processor unit on 1698 corneal confocal microscopy images; for external validation, it was further tested on 2137 images. The algorithm was developed to identify total nerve fibre length, branch points, tail points, number and length of nerve segments, and fractal numbers. Sensitivity analyses were undertaken to determine the AUC for ACCMetrics and our algorithm for the diagnosis of diabetic neuropathy.

resultsThe intraclass correlation coefficients for our algorithm were superior to those for ACCMetrics for total corneal nerve fibre length (0.933 vs 0.825), mean length per segment (0.656 vs 0.325), number of branch points (0.891 vs 0.570), number of tail points (0.623 vs 0.257), number of nerve segments (0.878 vs 0.504) and fractals (0.927 vs 0.758). In addition, our proposed algorithm achieved an AUC of 0.83, specificity of 0.87 and sensitivity of 0.68 for the classification of participants without (n = 90) and with (n = 132) neuropathy (defined by the Toronto criteria). CONCLUSIONS/

interpretationThese results demonstrated that our deep learning algorithm provides rapid and excellent localisation performance for the quantification of corneal nerve biomarkers. This model has potential for adoption into clinical screening programmes for diabetic neuropathy. DATA AVAILABILITY: The publicly shared cornea nerve dataset (dataset 1) is available at http://bioimlab.dei.unipd.it/Corneal%20Nerve%20Tortuosity%20Data%20Set.htm and http://bioimlab.dei.unipd.it/Corneal%20Nerve%20Data%20Set.htm.

Indexed as

Deep LearningAlgorithmsArtificial IntelligenceCorneaDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1Diabetic NeuropathiesHumansMicroscopy, ConfocalNerve FibersNeurodegenerative DiseasesCorneal confocal microscopyCorneal nerveDeep learningDiabetic neuropathyImage processing and analysisImage segmentationOphthalmic imagingSmall nerve fibres

Identifiers

PMID31720728
PMCPMC6946763

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.