Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31720478›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2019

An improved edge detection algorithm for X-Ray images based on the statistical range.

Anil K Bharodiya, Atul M Gonsai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Anil K BharodiyaUCCC & SPBCBA & SDHG College of BCA & I.T., BCA Department, Udhna, Surat, Gujarat, India.
Atul M GonsaiDepartment of Computer Science, Saurashtra University, Rajkot, Gujarat, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Edge detection is the prior stage to object recognition and considered as a pillar for image processing task. It is a process to detect such locations from images in terms of pixels where their intensity changing is abruptly. There are many types of images such as medical images, satellite images, articular images, industrial images, general purpose images etc. X-Ray is a type of medical image in which electronic radiation is passed into the human body to capture image of inner parts for better disease diagnoses by orthopaedics or radiologist. In this research paper, we have proposed an improved method to detect edges from human being's X-Ray images based on Gaussian filter and statistical range. Gaussian filter is used for image preprocessing and enhancement. Whereas, Statistical range is used to calculate difference between maximum and minimum pixels from every 3X3 image matrix partition. These two can work to detect edges from X-Ray images. We have also presented a comprehensive comparison of our proposed method with four existing latest methods/algorithms of edge detection. Apart from X-Ray images, experiments have also been conducted on human X-Ray images to detect edges. Further, we have found that our proposed method is superior in terms of MSE, RMSE, PSNR and computation time to detect edges from X-Ray images of human being.

Indexed as

Computer scienceEdge detectionImage processingMedical imagingMSEOrthopaedicsPSNRRMSEX-ray

Identifiers

PMID31720478
PMCPMC6838874

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.